Table 2

Assessing whether minimum standards were achieved in child maltreatment clinical assessments

CriteriaSole SA n=134Joint SA n=70PAN n=75CM (total) n=279
Trained doctor completed assessment134 (100%)70 (100%)75 (100%)279 (100%)
Social worker present134 (100%)70 (100%)62 (83%)265 (95%)
Protocol used130 (97%)70 (100%)75 (100%)275 (99%)
Case discussed with most senior doctor134 (100%)70 (100%)75 (100%)279 (100%)
Report generated114* (100%)70 (100%)75 (100%)259* (100%)
Attended medical follow-up assessment45 (34%)35 (50%)40 (53%)120 (43%)
Offered follow-up but was not brought37 (28%)20 (29%)18 (24%)75 (27%)
No follow-up appointment offered27 (20%)14 (20%)12 (16%)53 (19%)
Unknown25 (19%)1 (1%)5 (7%)31 (11%)
Attended psychological follow-up assessment73 (55%)24 (34%)4 (5%)101 (36%)
Offered a follow-up but was not brought38 (28%)14 (20%)3 (4%)55 (19%)
No follow-up appointment offered17 (13%)24 (34%)68 (90%)109 (39%)
Unknown6 (4%)8 (12%)0 (0%)14 (5%)
  • *Only reports that were needed were generated.

  • CM, child maltreatment; PAN, physical abuse and neglect; SA, sexual assault.