Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Intubating extremely premature newborns: a randomised crossover simulation study
  1. Joseph O'Connell,
  2. Gary Weiner
  1. Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gary Weiner; gweiner{at}med.umich.edu

Abstract

Objective Determine whether tracheal intubation of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) neonates is more successful with a size-0 or size-00 Miller laryngoscope blade.

Design Randomised crossover simulation study

Setting Simulated neonatal intensive care unit environment

Study subjects Neonatology physicians and nurse practitioners (n=55)

Interventions Subjects performed four intubations in succession on a high-fidelity ELBW manikin with size-0 Miller and size-00 Miller blades from two different manufacturers. The intubation sequence was randomised. Intubations were recorded and scored for time analysis. Subjects completed surveys about blade preferences before and after completing the series of intubations.

Main outcome measures Total laryngoscopy time and first attempt success in less than 30 s

Results There was no difference in total laryngoscopy time (median 23.7 vs 20.6 s) or first attempt success in <30 s (67.3% vs 69.1%) between the size-0 and size-00 blades. Differences were noted between the same size blades made by different manufacturers. Among subjects expressing a prestudy blade size preference, there was no difference in laryngoscopy time or first attempt success between blades. Regardless of blade size, subjects were less successful with the first blade in the randomised sequence.

Conclusions Our findings support the Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommendation identifying the size-00 blade as optional equipment. Operators need to be aware of design variations between manufacturers and they may benefit from ‘just-in-time’ training with a manikin prior to intubating a live patient.

  • intubation
  • newborn
  • laryngoscopy
  • neonatal resuscitation

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JO'C and GW both significantly contributed to formulating the study question, the study design, recruiting study participants, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. JO'C was the on-site investigator and GW performed the masked time analysis using the video-recorded material.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval University of MIchigan Institutional Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement There are no additional unpublished data. Video recordings of study subjects have been deleted, as indicated in the study consent. Survey data and data scored from the video recordings remain available only to JO'C and GW.