A one-time survey distributed to 2693 Canadian paediatricians enrolled in the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Programme was conducted between October and December 2019. We identified a wide range of severe vaping-related injuries and illnesses among children ages 0–17 (n=88), which were associated with the routine use or malfunctioning of a vaping device or the ingestion of vaping substances. The most common clinical presentations were acute respiratory symptoms and nicotine toxicity and 15% (n=13) of injuries required intensive care unit admission. Our study highlights the urgent need for substantive policy measures to help protect youth against the risks associated with vaping products.
- adolescent health
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Recent increases in rates of vaping and exposure to vaping devices1 have resulted in an increase in vaping-related injuries and illnesses, often in youth.2 Yet, knowledge about the incidence, characteristics and circumstances of these events among children and adolescents remains limited.
All practising paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists (n=2693) participating in the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Programme (CPSP), representing approximately 95% of practising paediatric providers in Canada, were invited to complete a one-time online or paper survey3 between October and December 2019. Participants were asked to provide case-level data for patients under 18 years of age who sought medical attention in the past 12 months for serious illnesses and/or injuries related to one of three mechanisms: (1) routine use of a vaping product, (2) ingestion of vaping substances and (3) malfunction of a vaping device. Descriptive, aggregate data are reported as requested by CPSP policy stating that case numbers and data elements for fewer than five cases cannot be presented (to maintain confidentiality). There was no patient or public involvement in this study.
The survey response rate was 42% (1131/2693) and included respondents from all Canadian provinces and territories. Of the 88 reported cases, there were 13 cases related to the ingestion of vaping substances, and the remainder were related to the routine use or malfunctioning of a vaping device (table 1). Forty-eight cases (55%) were male, and two-thirds (n=58, 66%) occurred in adolescents aged 15–17 years old. The most common presentation was respiratory distress/lung injury (n=39, 44%). Twenty-two cases (25%) were treated on a hospital ward; 13 cases (15%) required intensive care unit admission. Harms associated with ingestion of vaping products included nicotine toxicity, abdominal pain and nausea/vomiting.
Our survey identified a broad range of serious vaping-related injuries and illnesses. Injuries from routine use of a vaping device and resulting in respiratory distress or lung injury were the most common, and several cases required admission to a hospital ward or intensive care unit.
In 2019, 31.7% of Canadian high-school students reported vaping in the past 30 days.1 Initially presented as a less harmful alternative for adult smokers, vaping products are now more commonly used by youth—many of whom have never used tobacco products.4 Over 2800 hospitalised cases of vaping-associated lung injury (VALI) were reported between August 2019 and February 2020 in the USA, 15% of whom were adolescents ages 13–17 years.2 In Canada, only 19 cases (5 cases under age 20) had been publicly reported by March 2020.5 Our survey, which includes cases of vaping-related injuries that presented before the term VALI was defined, suggests that acute lung injuries only represent a subset of acute vaping-related harms seen in children and adolescents.
Legislative and policy changes limiting youth access to vaping products are at different stages of implementation worldwide. Nonetheless, in most parts of Europe and North America, vaping products remain easily accessible, even for underage youth.6 The 13 cases requiring intensive care admission captured by our survey emphasise the health burden associated with vaping-related injuries.
Our study has limitations. Survey participants only included paediatric providers; therefore, results do not include cases managed by non-paediatricians. In addition, data collection relied on voluntary reporting which resulted in a low-to-moderate response rate (42%) subject to non-response bias and recall bias given the 12-month reporting period.
Our study provides key insights about acute harms associated with vaping product exposure among children and adolescents. These insights highlight the urgent need for substantive policy measures to help mitigate the risks associated with vaping products.
The study team would like to thank the paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists who participated in this study.
Twitter @nicholaschadi, @Sarah_A_Richmond
Contributors NC participated in the conceptualisation and design of the study, conducted data analyses and drafted the initial manuscript. CM-H, SB and SAR critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors participated in the conceptualisation and design of the study, in data interpretation and approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding This study was supported by the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program a joint program of the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Public Health Agency of Canada. The Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program supported the design and conduct of the study as well as collection and management of the data.
Disclaimer The funders had no role in the analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Competing interests No, there are no competing interests.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval This study was exempt from research ethics approval as a public health surveillance project collecting only aggregate and anonymous data.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.