Discussion
Half of infant deaths occurred in the first month of life, mainly during the first week. Several factors associated with infant mortality were non-modifiable factors such as multiple pregnancy, being born during the harvest season or being born in a rural village. Death of a sibling was also associated with infant mortality, indicating the clustering of neonatal deaths in this population. Other risk factors were no BCG vaccination in the first week of life, no breast feeding and distance to nearest village with a PHC.
As mentioned above, our data show a clustering of deaths, as infants with a deceased sibling were at an increased risk of dying. Such effect has also been detected in other cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa,9 10 probably reflecting family-specific factors such as nutrition and lifestyle features.9 In Kenya, for example, slightly over 1% of the families accounted for up to 18% of neonatal deaths, while in Burkina Faso, the death of the older sibling was associated with a risk increase of almost 50%.9 10
Living in a rural village was associated with higher risk of dying during the first year of life. Such an association was not found in other African cohorts in Kenya and Zimbabwe.11 12 Furthermore, a study of 18 African countries found that initial statistical differences between living in urban or rural areas disappeared after adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic variables such as parental occupation, water source and wealth.4 The authors of that study suggested that, rather than the place of residence itself, it is the access to services and economic opportunities that might affect child survival. In our cohort, distances to the nearest village with a PHC were small (third quartile=2 km) and the city defining the urban population is not particularly large. Therefore, such a difference between urban and rural areas was unexpected after adjusting for the remaining covariates. However, given our limited capacity to adjust for socioeconomic factors, there may still be residual confounding that may explain the observed association.
In West Africa, the rainy season coincides with food shortage and an increase of malaria and other infectious diseases. Therefore, higher infant mortality during this period would be expected and has been described in Burkina Faso.9 This was not observed in Farafenni and confirms the finding of an earlier study carried out in a different, rural region of The Gambia (Upper River Division, between 1989 and 1993), in which no association between season of birth and postneonatal mortality was found.13 Furthermore, being born in the ‘hungry season’ (July to December), which corresponds to the rainy season and the malaria transmission season, seems to have a protective effect. While the absence of association of the previous study could be explained by the low prevalence of malaria in The Gambia, it would not explain an inversion of the expected risk. Alternatively, the food shortage in the ‘hungry season’ might not affect the infants directly if they are breastfed but could affect them indirectly if the breastfeeding pattern of the mothers is modified by the season. Another potential explanation could be that mothers may be too busy in the fields to constantly feed the baby or because hard physical work depletes her milk supply.
Twins have been identified as being at an increased risk of dying before the first birthday, both in The Gambia14 and in other sub-Saharan African countries,9 12 with the risk in twins about double the risk of singletons (similar to our results). The increased risk of early death can not only be linked to complications at birth and early life, including low birth weight, but also to cultural beliefs which can influence growth patterns and gender-biased care.9 14–17 The information required to identify the cause of death in our cohort was not available.
Other factors associated with increased mortality include no breast feeding and no BCG vaccination within the first week of life. Breast feeding is almost general in The Gambia. Due to the nature of the study, it was not possible to determine directionality and the strong association described could be explained by reverse causation, with children born with difficulties or from sick mothers being less likely to be breastfed.
In The Gambia, vaccine coverage at birth and the neonatal period is low,18 as vaccination offer takes place outside of the delivery and postnatal ward and women take back the children for vaccination after the naming ceremony that occurs 1 week after birth. BCG vaccination in the first week can therefore be interpreted as a proxy for health-seeking behaviour or good health from both mothers and babies, which could explain the observed association.
Our study has several limitations. First, recall bias is an important structural limitation of HDSS data and may have influenced the classification of outcomes and exposure variables. Since data are collected every 4 months, this can disproportionally affect early deaths. Therefore, the quality of the information may vary according to the endpoint. Furthermore, given Gambian’s reluctance to speak about deceased members of their family, the number of neonatal deaths captured by the HDSS, especially those taking place in the early neonatal period, is probably higher, potentially introducing bias. However, when we excluded this initial neonatal period in sensitivity analyses (first 7 days) the results did not change substantially, suggesting that the data from the first week did not substantially bias the results. Another limitation is the retrospective design which did not allow us to check the quality of the variables included in the analysis. For example, distances to the nearest village with a PHC was not originally collected and we had to calculate approximate values using the centre of the participant’s village as the starting point instead of the actual household’s position. These inaccuracies could have had an impact, considering the range of distances in our sample (0–4 km only). We used BCG vaccination within the first week of life as proxy for health-seeking behaviour and should therefore be interpreted with caution, as discussed above. Another limitation was the large amount of missing data for some variables (some as important as birth weight), which we were unable to impute and, therefore, were excluded from the multivariable models.
Finally, while our analyses describe the associations between risk factors and infant mortality, more in-depth studies would be required to better understand why these associations exist and how the different risk factors are inter-related.