Discussion
This report contributes a comprehensive picture of paediatric COVID-19 by school-age groupings in Fulton County prior to the emergence of the Delta variant. While some published studies present data on case prevalence, we provide additional insights on testing rates and test positivity to give a more complete view of COVID-19 among children. When testing became more widely available for all ages regardless of symptoms in June 2020, we found the proportion of COVID-19 cases among all children remained at or above 10%. Given children in our population were tested less than half as frequently as adults, our paediatric case rates likely underestimated the true burden of COVID-19 among this age group. Our data on test positivity further underscore this hypothesis: among children, testing and case numbers were highest among older children; however, younger children had similar rates of COVID-19 test positivity as older children and all children had similar rates of COVID-19 test positivity as adults, suggesting less frequent testing may have underestimated the true prevalence of COVID-19 cases among children.
With case interviews completed for 72% of children diagnosed with COVID-19, we found a substantial proportion (56.8%) were asymptomatic at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis. It has been estimated 79% of infections in adolescents aged 10–19 years are asymptomatic11; further suggesting our estimates on diagnosed case rates represented only the ‘tip of the iceberg’ compared with true paediatric infections. In line with previous studies of the clinical manifestation of COVID-19 in this age group,17 fever and cough were commonly reported among all age groups with older children more commonly reporting headache, muscle pain or sore throat. Importantly, clinical outcomes for children were overwhelmingly favourable, 1.3% of cases were hospitalised and one case died. Given the lower rates of testing among younger children and likely underdiagnosis of COVID-19 disease in this age group, it is highly likely that true paediatric infection hospitalisation rate and infection fatality rate was even lower than what we observed. One way to obtain a better estimate of the true infection rate is to implement universal testing; while this was not implemented in Fulton County, estimated seroprevalence data from Georgia suggested cumulative infections rates of SARS-CoV-2 among those aged less than 18 years were similar to the general population (16.0% vs 17.8%, respectively).1
Similar to previous studies,18 we found when broader community incidence increases, incidence among all age groups increases suggesting community spread impacts children as well as adults; however, it is important to recognise increases in testing are commensurate with increases in community prevalence, a phenomenon that suggests testing volume may be a marker for increased COVID-19 community spread, exposure or risk-taking behaviour at the population level. Understanding the potential role children play in the COVID-19 pandemic and carefully monitoring case rates, testing rates and test positivity trends in children and the factors that drive transmissibility among children is critical.
Events over 2020 and the first half of 2021 can help explain points in time when we saw higher and lower rates of COVID-19 among children. All Fulton County schools closed on 10 March 2020 and did not reopen for the remainder of the academic year. The first large spike in paediatric cases, observed in late June to early July 2020, may be partially attributed to summer travel or children attending summer camps, particularly among children aged 14–18 years. During 17–20 June 2020, one overnight camp in Georgia resulted in 260 known cases of COVID-19; 51% of those aged 6–10 years and 44% of those aged 11–17 years were infected.19 Test results were only available for 58% of attendees, so the true impact of this outbreak was likely underestimated, but this outbreak was highly publicised and may have resulted in an acute precamp and postcamp testing surge. Additionally, on 8 July 2020, the mayor of Atlanta signed an executive order mandating the use of face masks in public spaces and also prohibited gatherings of more than ten people, factors known to reduce transmission of viruses.20 The potential impact of this order, together with other changes in travel patterns, may explain the downward trends observed from the end of July to September 2020. In September 2020, Fulton County schools began phasing-in in-person instruction in a hybrid format (ie, both in-person and virtual instruction options) and by 14 October 2020 full-time in-person instruction was offered but remained optional. Paediatric cases increased again substantially from early November 2020 to mid-January 2021, mirroring the trends observed in the larger community. Factors contributing to this winter surge may have included the return of in-person schooling, holiday travel and mixing of households’ indoors and potentially unrecognised transmission of novel variants such as B.1.1.7, which was first identified in the USA in December 2020.21 Since the 2021 winter surge, paediatric cases declined through the start of June 2021 (the latest date for which this paper contains data). Availability and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, which were available to all individuals in Georgia over the age of 16 years beginning 25 March 2021 and over the age of 12 years beginning 11 May 2021 may help explain some of the downward trend in COVID-19 incidence the county experienced.
This evaluation was subject to limitations. First, while Fulton County Board of Health offered testing to individuals of all ages beginning in May 2020, not all testing facilities in and around Fulton County made COVID-19 testing readily available to children. This is an important factor that likely contributed substantially to the number of paediatric tests being far fewer than the number of adult tests. Second, data available from case investigations of young children depend entirely on interviews with proxies, which do not always result in the most accurate data on symptomaticity or source of infection. It is also important to acknowledge we did not have data on whether children were attending school in-person during this time frame, limiting the ability to make inferences about the role schools may have played in paediatric COVID-19 transmission; however, studies have revealed low rates of COVID-19 transmission within schools when mitigation strategies are in place.22 23
Strengths of this study include our data sources. In Georgia, SendSS is the most comprehensive surveillance data source for COVID-19 cases and includes data on cases tested across the majority of testing sites in Fulton County. This allowed us to observe paediatrics trends using the most data possible for cases diagnosed among Fulton County residents, regardless of testing location. Because our datasets included case age, we could also examine COVID-19 trends among smaller, informative paediatric age groups.