Original research
Characteristics of low-acuity paediatric emergency department consultations in two tertiary hospitals in Switzerland: a retrospective observational study
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Similar experience of low-acuity paediatric ED visits in Northern Europe
    • S Jonas Åkeson, Professor/Senior consultant, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Malmö, Sweden

    Dear Editor,

    We have read the interesting clinical report on Swiss low-acuity paediatric ED visits by Manon Jaboyedoff and coworkers, published in the BMJ Paediatrics Open in November 2021.

    Their main study findings confirm in much detail what our research group has already found and reported in a series of systematic clinical studies on paediatric ED care at our university hospital in southern Sweden five years ago [1-4], also defended as a PhD thesis, entitled Paediatric emergency care - seeking, triage and management, in 2018 at Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

    Most Swedish parents are aware of prehospital medical alternatives before attending a paediatric ED, and less-urgent visits can be safely redirected already on ED arrival according to predefined protocols. Lower socio-economic status is associated with less-urgent care seeking, and direct seeking of paediatric ED care is promoted by perceived medical urgency, by overestimation of actual severity, and by low availability of prehospital medical facilities, particularly outside office-hours. Hospital-based primary care facilities out-of-office-hours enable efficient management of less-urgent paediatric ED cases at more appropriate levels of medical care.

    The close similarity in main findings between the present study and ours is far from surprising, when also taking the similar healthcare systems and social security patterns in various part of Europe into account.

    We therefore c...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.