Article Text
Abstract
In this retrospective study using claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse including 24 658 769 eligible person-years of coverage in the USA, there was substantial decline in codeine dispensing between 2010 and 2019. However, we also observed a persistence of codeine prescribing despite the FDA contraindication in 2018. In 2019, codeine was still being prescribed to children aged 12–17 years at 934 prescriptions per 100 000 person-years of coverage and 106 per 100 000 person-years of coverage in children aged<12 years.
- pain
- health services research
- epidemiology
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
Codeine is a prodrug that is metabolised in the liver to morphine to produce analgesia and antitussive effects. The metabolism is based on the cytochrome P450-2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype, which is highly variable and can result in differing amounts of morphine produced. Even with standard dosing, ultrarapid metabolisers will produce significant morphine which may cause respiratory depression and possible death, particularly in children with a history of obstructive sleep apnea.1–3 Beginning in 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released increasingly restrictive warnings and ultimately recommended against the use of codeine-containing products in patients under age 18 (table 1).4 In this context, little is known about how paediatric codeine prescribing changed over time in the USA, including periods before and after the main FDA Drug Safety Communications (DSC).
Methods
We performed a retrospective database study of privately insured children (age<18 years) who received one or more prescriptions for codeine, opioids other than codeine or non-opioid cough and cold medications between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. We used pharmacy claims from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW), a database containing over 150 million unique individuals across the USA who are privately insured and/or Medicare beneficiaries. The OLDW includes 20% of the commercially insured population in the USA, with similar distributions of age, sex and race or ethnicity to the US commercial population. This study was deemed exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board.
We used the National Drug Code Directory to categorise drugs containing codeine, opioids other than codeine and non-opioid cough and cold medications. A list of drugs evaluated in each group is available in online supplemental file 1.
Supplemental material
We analysed prescriptions dispensed in children aged<12 years and those aged 12–17 years (same age groupings used in codeine-related FDA DSCs). Descriptive statistics are reported as prescriptions dispensed per 100 000 age-group person-years of coverage.
Patient and public involvement
There was no patient or public involvement in this study.
Results
We identified 24 658 769 eligible person-years of coverage. Codeine dispensing declined over the entire study period in both children under 12 years and those aged 12–17 years. In children<12 years, codeine dispensing decreased 97.2% (from 3760 in 2010 to 106 per 100 000 person-years of coverage in 2019). In older children aged 12–17 years, codeine dispensing decreased 78.9% (from 4433 in 2010 to 934 in 2019). These declines were greater than the declines in opioids other than codeine (age<12 years, declined 58.3% from 2104 to 877; age 12–17 years, declined 61.4% from 10 439 to 4031). They were also greater than the changes in non-opioid cough and cold medications (age<12 years, declined 52.6% from 7980 to 3784; age 12–17 years, increased 39.8% from 3149 to 4400). For both age groups, the largest single-year decline in codeine dispensing was from 2017 to 2018: for children<12 years, codeine dispensing declined 61.2% (from 586 to 228); for children aged 12–17 years, codeine dispensing declined 38.1% (from 2094 in 2017 to 1295 in 2018). Figure 1 illustrates these trends. Trends of codeine prescriptions separated by pain or cough indications are available in online supplemental file 2.
Supplemental material
Discussion
Codeine dispensing in children has declined substantially between 2010 and 2019, including the most severe restriction in early 2018 during which the FDA made codeine contraindicated. These relative declines were specific to codeine versus other opioids and versus non-opioid cough and cold medications and were greatest in the year the most severe restriction was issued. While FDA restrictions were temporally associated with a decrease in codeine use, prescribing was already declining prior to the first DSC for both codeine and non-codeine products. In 2019, codeine was still being prescribed to children aged 12–17 years at 934 prescriptions per 100 000 person-years of coverage and 106 per 100 000 person-years of coverage in children aged<12 years. Other studies have also showed the persistence of codeine prescribing despite an absolute FDA contraindication.5 6 Efforts to cease the use of codeine in paediatric patients need to continue.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study was deemed exempt from review by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
Footnotes
Twitter @lucasojesilva12
Contributors Conceptualisation: JLA, FB and MMJ. Formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation and guarantor: MMJ. Writing—original draft: LOJS and JLA. Investigation, writing—review and editing and provided critical revision and contribution for important intellectual content: All authors.
Funding This study was in part supported by the James H. and Helen F. Crossingham Emergency Medicine Career Development Award (number TN005446), an intramural research funding given to JLA.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.