Article Text

Download PDFPDF

363 A successful model of delivering initial health assessments (IHA) for children and young people in care (CYPIC) in a pandemic
  1. Katherine Shelley,
  2. Kerry Holt,
  3. Latha Tirupati Kumara
  1. UK


Background In the UK, from March 2020 in-person consultations were limited to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Statutory guidance recommends that these happen in a timely manner when a child enters into care. RCPCH standards state that IHAs completed by telephone should ideally be completed by in-person reviews within 3–6 months. Hence a dual clinic model of virtual, followed by short face to face appointments, was developed to minimise contact whilst ensuring quality of consultations. Follow up appointments focused on growth, physical and developmental examination and allowed the clinician to speak to the Child or Young Person in Care (CYPiC).


  • To review documentation for compliance with regulations

  • To seek users’ feedback and make service improvements

Methods Records for 23 of 24 users who attended virtual IHAs from April to July 2020 were reviewed from the electronic CYPiC database (excluding one child who ceased being in care after the virtual clinic). Service users were asked to provide written feedback after each appointment.

Results Waiting times for face-to-face appointments ranged from 16–124 days, median 47 days (within recommended timeframe). 74% had the same clinician for both appointments, ensuring continuity of care. Appropriate consent was taken in all cases. Additionally, consent was taken from every young person with capacity to consent. 91% were invited to be seen alone. Wishes and feelings were taken into account in all but one child. Most (but not all) of the relevant information to aid completion of the IHA was available.

Abstract 363 Table 1
Abstract 363 Table 2

Documentation of 11 out of 13 parameters was more complete compared to the previous year

Response rate to the feedback forms was 70%.

Positive comments included ‘comfortable in own home – more relaxed’ and ‘treated same as if in clinic’. There were 2 negative comments – ‘video link not working’ and ‘uncomfortable wearing a mask’. No users mentioned attending 2 appointments as a negative aspect.

Abstract 363 Table 3

Conclusions Despite limitations in delivering services during the pandemic, this dual model of clinic delivery ensured a high quality service. Feedback was positive as was user engagement with this model which emphasized child-centric care. Learning from this can be applied to other clinics such as review health assessments. Holistic CYPiC statutory assessments through efficient use of virtual technology, in combination with outcome focused in person reviews may become more common place in the future.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.