Article Text

Download PDFPDF

438 Promoting safe sleeping in a neonatal unit
  1. Catherine Taylor,
  2. Amna Suliman,
  3. Martha Jones,
  4. Louise Mawby,
  5. Esmira Jafarova,
  6. Sarah Panjwani
  1. UK


Background Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has been significantly reduced in the UK following the introduction of the ‘back to sleep campaign’ and ongoing efforts in raising public awareness of the importance of a safe sleep environment. Babies born prematurely or who have ongoing health conditions are known to be at higher risk. Local data suggests most babies that die from SIDS locally have modifiable risk factors.

On neonatal units, babies may initially require prone positioning and the presence of equipment within an incubator, however they should be transitioned to a safe sleep environment prior to discharge. Research has shown that modelling a safe sleep environment on neonatal units can improve parental compliance and patient safety after discharge.

Objectives To assess our baseline for sleeping environments within our unit and then perform interventions and repeat this process in PDSA cycles to improve the sleep environment of our vulnerable patients prior to discharge.

Methods We performed sequential PDSA cycles after an initial baseline evaluation of sleeping environments on our neonatal unit. For each cycle we assessed cots according to the defined features of a safe sleep cot. Inclusion criterion was any baby in an open cot admitted to the neonatal unit. Safe sleep cots were defined by current lullaby trust guidelines: Clear without other items, flat and firm mattress, baby sleeping on its back, baby sleeping with their feet to foot of cot and blankets below shoulder level and not loose. The quality improvement project is registered locally.

Results Baseline data in 2018 showed that no babies were in a cot consistent with all guidelines, only two thirds were on their back (n=28/42) and only one cot was bare. 83% (n=35/42) were on tilted mattresses and only 17% (n=7/42) of babies had feet at the foot of the cot. Blankets were loose in 60% (n=25/42) and only below the shoulders in half the babies.

Results were presented to our neurodevelopmental MDT. Initial interventions were around team education, widening the project team and introduction of cot cards to be placed in cots and updated with any individual planned variances. We also liaised with our local Child Death Overview Panel, for whom SIDS is a local priority.

Repeated PDSA cycles in 2020 showed some initial improvement from baseline with 80% (n=8/10) of babies on their backs, 60% of cots bare, 60% of babies at the foot of the cot, and blankets only loose in 20% and above the shoulders in 30%. Subsequent interventions included laminated signs being placed on all cots. Progress stalled at the most recent completed cycle with 79% (n=22/28) of babies on their back but only 11% (n=3/28) of cots bare.

Further planned work includes increasing parent engagement and education earlier in admission and incorporating sleeping environment into standard daily documentation.

Conclusions This ongoing quality improvement project shows that over time safe sleep environments can improve on a neonatal unit, which is known to have a positive influence on this vulnerable patient group being in a safe cot at home after discharge.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.