Participants

The researchers compiled a list of special education schools and organisations catering to the needs of children with CP across Johannesburg to facilitate participant recruitment. Although 10 sites were initially approached, only 6 responded and were included in the study. Subsequently, participant information letters were distributed by the schools/organisations to all eligible individuals within their networks, inviting them to contact the researchers if interested in participating. We were unable to determine the exact number of emails sent because these were distributed by the schools/organisations. However, only 14 participants responded to the call.

Participants were purposively sampled based on the following inclusion criteria: caregivers of a child with a (1) diagnosis of CP; (2) between the ages of 4 and 12 years of age, (3) ability to speak/read/understand English; (3) to be living in South Africa between March 2020 and April 2022. The age range for the children was selected to approximate school-aged individuals while accounting for the heterogeneity in children with CP. This decision also considered the varied organisations working with children across different age groups.

Procedure

Each participant was required to complete a demographic questionnaire, followed by a semistructured interview guided by open-ended questions and probes. The interview guide aimed to elicit the long-lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children with CP in South Africa, from the perspective of their caregiver. The focus was on the continued challenges, benefits, considerations and any additional support they might require in this context. The guide (online supplemental material 1) allowed flexibility for participants to freely express their thoughts and experiences and was developed by the researchers based on the study objectives. Prior to the main study, the questionnaire and interview guide underwent testing on two mothers, with no modifications made following the pilot interviews.

Interested participants were provided with further information on the study using the participant information sheet. All participants provided signed informed consent. Demographic information was collected prior to the interview. Semistructured interviews were conducted either virtually through Zoom (n = 9) or face to face (n = 5). For face-to-face interviews, COVID-19 protocols were observed, and suitable meeting times were arranged. Caregivers underwent one interview, lasting approximately 1 hour each (range: 22–48 min). To ensure a comprehensive understanding of the caregiving experience within families of children with CP, multiple caregivers were included in some families. This decision was informed by the recognition of the diverse roles caregivers play in supporting children with CP, including grandparents and fathers, whose perspectives are often under-represented in disability research, particularly in the South African context.9 10 By intentionally including multiple caregivers, such as grandmothers and fathers, the study aimed to address this limitation and capture a more diverse range of experiences. Therefore, following the initial caregiver interview, participants were asked if any other family caregiver would like to participate in the interviews. Two additional interviews took place. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. To prioritise anonymity and confidentiality, personal details, including names, were excluded from the transcripts.

Data analysis

The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis was conducted in several sequential steps.11 In the initial step, the audio data from the interviews were transcribed, and the dataset was read and re-read by researchers (RB, AM and SNA). Notes were taken to identify patterns within the data, including similarities between topics discussed in the interviews. The data were then organised into meaningful groups based on identified patterns. This involved grouping similar topics expressed by caregivers and generating codes. Themes found within the data were documented, and relationships between the initial codes were identified. This was done independently by all authors (RB, AM and SNA) and a consensus was then decided on the list of codes. The themes were then finalised by ensuring the themes had sufficient supporting data, involved collapsing overlapping themes, and refining certain codes and themes. Researchers collaborated to assess data adequacy and refine thematic structures.

A comprehensive review of the data was undertaken and themes were identified. All researchers are speech-language pathologist who work with children with CP and have had experience working both during and after COVID-19. To ensure the trustworthiness of the data, rigorous measures such as member checking, reflective journaling and regular reflective discussions between the researchers were implemented throughout the data collection and analysis processes.12

Findings

The demographic information is summarised in table 1. The majority of participants were female (n=13), and the participants interviewed were predominantly mothers (n=9). Participants had varying types of employment, with most of whom were employed (n=9) with five participants being unemployed at the time of the study and one participant who has continued to experience unemployment due to job loss as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic (Participant 11). Of the participants, most had access to private healthcare (n=9) with five participants having access to public healthcare only.

All families had a child with CP between the ages of 4–12 years (M=7.3 years, SD=2.6) with slightly more being males (n=7) than female (n=5). Ten children had and unknown type of CP, this may be due to the fact that determining the classification type of CP within the paediatric population with accuracy is difficult.13 Therefore, caregivers may not have been told the type of CP their child has. However, caregivers were able to report on their child’s ambulatory status according to the GMFCS (Gross Motor Function Classification System) level. It is important to note that as these were caregiver interviews children were not formally assessed. The ambulatory CP children, that is, levels I, II, III were 41.5%, and non-ambulatory Level IV and V were 58.3%.

Following the analysis, several core themes emerged from the data illustrating the added challenges experienced by caregivers of children with CP, some of the positive changes that have happened as a result of the pandemic, and the need for additional and continued support. Main themes included (1) long-term regressions and increased muscle stiffness, (1.1) exposure to infection postlockdown, (2) increased weight gain and inability to participate in activities of daily living, (3) (alleviated) food insecurity and (4) technological advancement and vlogging out of lockdown. Responses from the family members are included to support the themes identified. Themes are displayed in figure 1 and presented according to how commonly they emerged within the data across participant narratives from most to least prevalent.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 1

Biopsychosocial framing of children with CP’s experience postlockdown. CP, cerebral palsy.

Biological factors

Our findings indicate that the lockdown had a profound impact on the development of children with CP, resulting in increased weight gain, regressions, muscle stiffness and heightened vulnerability to infection postpandemic. Studies have shown that weight gain in children with CP can lead to difficulties in mobility and independent functioning, underscoring the significance of addressing this issue.20 Increased weight gain and muscle stiffness are directly correlated with reduced ambulatory ability, greater functional impairment and reduced independence.21 Without proper intervention, these conditions may worsen and become irreversible. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a shift in hospital policies in South Africa. While care for children aged 5 and below is prioritised, there is a critical gap in services for children with CP who require rehabilitative care beyond this age. This gap becomes even more pronounced in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has exacerbated the need for additional therapy and support and to mitigate the long-term impacts of the pandemic.

Existing evidence highlights how children with CP may benefit from formal education.22 However, many caregivers in the study reported the challenges with finding appropriate school placement or therapy post-COVID-19, impacting on continued regressions and causing further problems with development and muscle stiffness. Even with South Africa’s inclusive education policy, many schools do not have capacity and are not prioritising education for children with disabilities or do not provide therapeutic services at the school, which majority of children with CP will require.23 Many caregivers experience challenges in the public healthcare system where their children are no longer prioritised for therapy but are unable to access these services elsewhere.24 This suggests the need to operationalise educational policies that make formal education more accessible to all, including children with CP, particularly post-COVID-19 knowing the regressions many children experienced, and to assist with the provision of therapeutic services at CP schools in the country.

Psychological factors

This study highlighted that children with CP are at a continued risk for psychological and emotional difficulties. Research has also indicated that children with neurodevelopmental disabilities are at a higher risk for continued psychological challenges such as increased anxiety and depression postpandemic.25 26 Additionally, many caregivers have also experienced continued emotional strain, which may impact their ability to adequately care for their children without appropriate support.25 27 Therefore, it is important that psychological support is continued and monitored for children with CP and their caregivers.

One positive aspect regarding children’s well-being was the ways in which online platforms like YouTube provided avenues for empowerment and social connection for children with CP, emphasising the importance of leveraging digital resources.28–30 However, it is crucial to acknowledge that this positive outcome is not accessible to all families, as those in the study all access private healthcare services only and had access to additional resources, technology and services not afforded to all participants. This underscores the need for policy changes to ensure equitable access to digital resources, especially for individuals with disabilities, to enhance their overall well-being and further research is required to understand the innovative ways in which technology can be used to provide emotional and psychological support to children with CP in South Africa and other low-resource settings. Future research could explore the utilisation of artificial intelligence to support socioemotional and communicative functioning.

Social factors

Financial strain and food insecurity emerged as significant concerns among caregivers, underscoring the broader social determinants of health affecting families of children with CP. In the current study, families experienced food insecurity, although this was alleviated for the children as they have gone back to school, this continues to be an issue for many caregivers and families. School feeding programmes played a critical role in addressing food insecurity, highlighting the importance of educational institutions in supporting vulnerable populations.31 However, the financial burden on families remains substantial, and many South Africans have reported on the continued socioeconomic difficulties, which have disproportionally affected those who are already living in poverty or with disabilities which has intensified and increased inequality, unemployment, hunger and food insecurity.32–34

Notably, families of children with CP, already a vulnerable population continue to experience challenges with restricted access to healthcare, public services and supports.3 Additionally, those relying on public transportation have faced additional challenges postpandemic, highlighting the intersecting issues of disability, socioeconomic disadvantage and transportation inequality. In South Africa, there are vast inequalities in those living with socioeconomic disadvantages and their access to resources and services. Majority of South Africans use minibus taxi’s, however, these are not accommodating for wheelchair users where often persons are not able to bring their wheelchair onto the taxi or being charged an additional fare.18 As a result, persons with disabilities continue to experience social and economic exclusion.35 This is noteworthy as majority of children in this study levels IV and V on the GMFCS requiring wheelchairs. The lack of accessible transportation and infrastructure exacerbates these difficulties, particularly for families with limited financial means who rely on public services. Therefore, even though these challenges are not new, they are continuous and have been exacerbated and there is a call for accessible, sustainable and inclusive transport provision to address the needs of children with disabilities.

The study had several limitations. First, it focused on a small geographical area, limiting the experiences to caregivers in Johannesburg. Second, the study did not specifically target rural populations, which are under-represented in the literature and often experience barriers to accessing healthcare services. Third, due to the unique sociocultural context of South Africa, including cultural perceptions surrounding disability and access to healthcare, may have influenced caregiver experiences in ways that differ from other settings. Lastly, although various caregivers were included, the sample was predominantly mothers, reflecting a common trend in research where mothers are often the primary caregivers. This highlights the need for a more inclusive approach in future research, such as those from fathers and grandparents. Future studies should aim for a broader representation of families from different countries and contexts postpandemic, considering the long-term experiences of participants.