@article {Ariglianie000690, author = {Michele Arigliani and Sean Zheng and Gary Ruiz and Subarna Chakravorty and Cara J Bossley and David Rees and Atul Gupta}, title = {Comparison of pulse oximetry and earlobe blood gas with CO-oximetry in children with sickle cell disease: a retrospective review}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {e000690}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000690}, publisher = {BMJ Specialist Journals}, abstract = {Objectives To investigate the agreement between pulse oximetry (SpO2) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured by CO-oximetry on arterialised earlobe blood gas (EBG) in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD).Design and setting We retrospectively reviewed 39 simultaneous and paired SaO2 EBG and SpO2 measurements from 33 ambulatory patients with SCD (32 subjects with Haemoglobin SS and one with Haemoglobin S{\ss}+, 52\% male, mean{\textpm}SD age 11.0{\textpm}3.6, age range 5{\textendash}18). Measurements were performed between 2012 and 2015 when participants were asymptomatic. Hypoxaemia was defined as SaO2 <=93\%. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of SpO2 as compared with EBG SaO2.Results The mean{\textpm}SD SpO2 and SaO2 values in the same patients were, respectively, 93.6\%{\textpm}3.7\% and 94.3\%{\textpm}2.9\%. The bias SpO2{\textendash}SaO2 was -0.7\% (95\% limits of agreement from -5.4\% to 4.1\%) and precision was 2.5\%. In 9/39 (23\%) cases, the difference in SpO2{\textendash}SaO2 was greater than the expected error range {\textpm}2\%, with SaO2 more often underestimated by SpO2 (6/9), especially at SpO2values <=93\%. Thirteen participants (33\%) were hypoxaemic. The sensitivity of SpO2 for hypoxaemia was 100\%, specificity 85\% and positive predictive value 76\%.Conclusions Pulse oximetry was inaccurate in almost a quarter of measurements in ambulatory paediatric patients with SCD, especially at SpO2values <=93\%. In these cases, oxygen saturation can be confirmed through EBG CO-oximetry, which is easier to perform and less painful than traditional arterial blood sampling.}, URL = {https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000690}, eprint = {https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e000690.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Paediatrics Open} }