Table 2

Diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori infection

MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Invasive
HistologyDegree of chronic inflammation and activity, diagnosis of premalignant lesions such as grade of atrophy and gastric intestinal metaplasia, malignancy and coccoid forms.Need special skills, and costly observer-dependency; time-consuming; dependence of accuracy on the receiver of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPI); size,site and number of biopsies.
CultureSpecificity (100%), provides pattern of antimicrobial resistance.Important location of the biopsies, digestive haemorrhage, recent treatments with antibiotics, PPI, bismuth; is expensive and time-consuming test. Sensitivity on the staff skill and culture media.
Rapid urease testRapid, inexpensive, high sensitivity and specificity (almost 100%).False-negative: bismuth, antibiotics, PPI, achlorhydria and the prevalence rate of infection, bacteria density digestive haemorrhage.
False-positive: Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus aureus.
Non-invasive or invasive
PCRAntimicrobial susceptibility, fast, high sensitivity and specificity.False-positive results due to detect DNA pieces of dead bacteria.
Non-invasive
Urea breath testIdeal for evaluating treatment response in children over 6 years of age.High false-positive results in children aged <6 years; false-negative in recent treatments with bismuth, PPI antibiotics, not to use in children as an initial diagnosis.
Stool antigen testNo age dependency; fast, easy; useful after therapy.False-negative results in recent treatments with bismuth, PPI, antibiotics; dependency of accuracy on the cut-off value and treatment status.
SerologyWidely available, cheapest.Sensitivity in children is low, not used to confirm the eradication, inability to detect acute or chronic infection.
  • PPI, proton pump inhibitor.