Table 2

Effect of the intervention on error and time

Errors
	OR	95% CI	P value
Multivariable model
Intervention full vs control	0.08	0.02 to 0.36	<0.001
Institution Children’s hospital	1.27	0.75 to 2.15	0.382
Institution General hospital	1.12	0.74 to 1.70	0.587
PEDeDose user partly vs no	0.57	0.27 to 1.29	0.178
PEDeDose user yes vs partly	0.88	0.37 to 2.11	0.771
Unadjusted model
Intervention full vs control	0.15	0.08 to 0.27	<0.001
Time
	Time change (%)	95% CI	P value
Multivariable model
Intervention full vs control	−45	−51 to −39	<0.001
Institution Children’s hospital	−18	−26 to −8	<0.001
Institution General hospital	3	−6 to 12	0.585
Experience 5–10 years vs <5 years	3	−11 to 18	0.722
Experience >10 years vs 5–10 years	1	−16 to 15	0.862
PEDeDose user partly vs no	6	−9 to 26	0.472
PEDeDose user yes vs partly	-8	−22 to 9	0.357
Unadjusted model
Intervention full vs control	−45	−48 to −42	<0.001

The table shows the results of the confirmatory analyses comparing the CDSS PEDeDose (full) with the SmPC (control). The multivariable and unadjusted models with only the intervention variable and random intercepts for both subject and item are presented. The reference category for each comparison of the ordered categorical variables is marked in bold.
CDSS, clinical decision support system; SmPC, Summary of Product Characteristics.