Table 1

Summary of outcomes and certainty of the evidence

Outcome(s)No of participants (studies)Relative effect
RR/MD
(95% CI)
Anticipated absolute effect (95% CI)Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Primary outcome: effect on asthma severity
 Composite Asthma Severity Score (assessed with different scores)1953 (6 RCTs)SMD −0.1
(−0.2 to 0.02)
SMD 0.09 lower (0.2 lower to 0.02 higher)⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
Individual scores
 PRAM score981 (3 RCTs)−0.07
(−0.42 to 0.28)
0.07 lower (0.28 lower to 0.36 higher)⨁⨁◯◯
Low†
 Asthma Severity Score872 (2 RCTs)−0.14
(−0.29 to 0.00)
0.14 lower (0.29 lower to 0)⨁⨁◯◯
Low†
 Modified Pulmonary Index Score100 (1 RCT)0.38
(−0.25 to 1.01)
0.38 higher (0.25 lower to 1.01 higher)⨁⨁◯◯
Low†
Secondary outcomes
 Need for hospitalisation978 (3 RCTs)0.92
(0.79 to 1.06)
33 fewer per 1000 (86 fewer to 25 more)⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
 Need for intensive care unit admission1037 (3 RCTs)1.29
(0.75 to 2.20)
12 more per 1000 (11 fewer to 52 more)⨁⨁◯◯
Low*
 Discharged by 24 hours365 (1 RCT)1.02
(0.95 to 1.10)
18 more per 1000 (44 fewer to 89 more)⨁⨁◯◯
Low†
 Length of hospital stay (hours)1070 (4 RCTs)−4.6
(−10 to 0.8)
4.59 lower (9.99 lower to 0.81 higher)⨁◯◯◯
Very low‡
Pulmonary function tests
 Peak expiratory flow rate (% predicted)145 (2 RCTs)19.3
(8.9 to 29.8)
19.34 higher (8.94 higher to 29.75 higher)⨁⨁◯◯
Low§
 FEV1 (% predicted)62 (1 RCT)8.1
(−3.0 to 19.2)
8.1 higher (3.03 lower to 19.23 higher)⨁◯◯◯
Very low¶
Vital parameters
 Heart rate (beats/min)372 (5 RCTs)−2.7
(−8.2 to 2.7)
2.71 lower (8.16 lower to 2.74 higher)⨁◯◯◯
Very low†‡
 Respiratory rate (breaths/min)1056 (5 RCTs)−0.9
(−1.4 to −0.4)
0.87 lower (1.38 lower to 0.36 lower)⨁⨁◯◯
Low§
 Oxygen saturation1071 (5 RCTs)1.2
(−3.5 to 5.8)
1.16 higher (3.47 lower to 5.79 higher)⨁◯◯◯
Very low*‡
 Any adverse event2015 (7 RCTs)1.45
(0.63 to 3.34)
32 more per 1000 (26 fewer to 165 more)⨁◯◯◯
Very low*‡
  • *Wide 95% CI crossing the threshold for benefit/harm.

  • †Wide 95% CI crossing null line and small sample size.

  • ‡Substantial heterogeneity.

  • §Sample size is far less than optimal information size (OIS).

  • ¶Sample size is far less than optimal information size (OIS) and 95% CI crossing the threshold of appreciable benefit/harm.

  • FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations; MD, mean dfference; PRAM, Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure; RCTs, randomised controlled trials; RR, risk ratio; SMD, standardised mean difference.