Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in the first year after pediatric liver transplantation

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposes

Tacrolimus (TAC) is the most widely used immunosuppressant for the prevention of acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. Its pharmacokinetics (PK) show considerable variability, making TAC a good candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The principal aim of the study was to describe the PK of TAC in pediatric patients during the first year after transplantation.

Methods

Routine TDM trough levels of TAC were obtained from 42 pediatric liver allograft recipients during the first year after transplantation. A population PK model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to describe TAC PK during this period and to explain the observed variability by means of patients’ demographics, biochemical test results and physiological characteristics.

Results

The PK of TAC were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Apparent volumes of the central compartment, intercomparmental clearance and maximum blood clearance estimates were 253 L, 115 L/day and 314 L/day, respectively. The absorption first-order rate and volume of peripheral compartment were fixed to 4.5 h-1 and 100 L, respectively. While hematocrit levels, time after transplantation and bodyweight influenced TAC clearance, bodyweight was the only covariate retained on volume of distribution.

Conclusions

We developed a TAC population PK model in pediatrics covering the first year after liver transplantation that may serve as a tool for TAC dose individualization as part of TDM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flanagan WM, Corthésy B, Bram RJ, Crabtree GR (1991) Nuclear association of a T-cell transcription factor blocked by FK-506 and cyclosporin A. Nature 352(6338):803–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly D (2006) Current issues in pediatric transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 10(6):712–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Staatz CE, Tett SE (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet 43(10):623–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Naesens M, Kuypers D, Sarwal M (2009) Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4(2):481–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodriguez-Peralverez M, Germani G, Darius T, Lerut J, Tsochatzis E, Burroughs AK (2012) Tacrolimus trough levels, rejection and renal impairment in liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant 12:2797–2814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Antiga L, Dhawan A, Portmann B, Francavilla R, Rela M, Heaton N, Mieli-Vergani G (2002) Late cellular rejection in paediatric liver transplantation: aetiology and outcome. Transplantation 73(1):80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Staatz CE, Goodman LK, Tett SE (2010) Effect of CYP3A and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors: part I. Clin Pharmacokinet 49(3):141–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis C, Staatz CE, Tett SE (2003) Bayesian forecasting and prediction of tacrolimus concentrations in pediatric liver and adult renal transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 25(2):158–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasuhara M, Hashida T, Toraguchi M et al (1995) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of FK 506 in pediatric patients receiving living-related donor liver transplantations. Transplant Proc 27(1):1108–1110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sam WJ, Aw M, Quak SH, Lim SM, Charles BG, Chan SY, Ho PC (2000) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in Asian pediatric liver transplant patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 50(6):531–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sam WJ, Tham LS, Holmes MJ, Aw M, Quak SH, Lee KH, Lim S et al (2006) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in whole blood and plasma in asian liver transplant patients. Clin Pharmacokinet 45(1):59–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Staatz CE, Taylor PJ, Lynch SV, Willis C, Charles BG, Tett SE (2001) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down or full liver transplants. Transplantation 72(6):1056–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. García Sánchez MJ, Manzanares C, Santos-Buelga D, Blázquez A, Manzanares J, Urruzuno P, Medina E (2001) Covariate effects on the apparent clearance of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplant patients undergoing conversion therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 40(1):63–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukudo M, Yano I, Masuda S et al (2006) Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic analysis of tacrolimus in pediatric living-donor liver transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80(4):331–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallin JE, Bergstrand M, Wilczek HE, Nydert PS, Karlsson MO, Staatz CE (2011) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation: early posttransplantation clearance. Ther Drug Monit 33(6):663–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. de Wildt SN, van Schaik RH, Soldin OP et al (2011) The interactions of age, genetics, and disease severity on tacrolimus dosing requirements after pediatric kidney and liver transplantation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67(12):1231–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Antignac M, Hulot JS, Boleslawski E, Hannoun L, Touitou Y, Farinotti R, Lechat P, Urien S (2005) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in full liver transplant patients: modeling of the post-operative clearance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 61(5–6):409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Staatz CE, Willis C, Taylor PJ, Lynch SV, Tett SE (2003) Toward better outcomes with tacrolimus therapy: population pharmacokinetics and individualized dosage prediction in adult liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9(2):130–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukatsu S, Yano I, Igarashi T et al (2001) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult recipients receiving living-donor liver transplantation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 57(6–7):479–484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zahir H, McLachlan AJ, Nelson A, McCaughan G, Gleeson M, Akhlaghi F (2005) Population pharmacokinetic estimation of tacrolimus apparent clearance in adult liver transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 27(4):422–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blanchet B, Duvoux C, Costentin CE et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic assessment of tacrolimus in liver-transplant recipients during the early post-transplantation period. Ther Drug Monit 30(4):412–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li D, Lu W, Zhu JY, Gao J, Lou YQ, Zhang GL (2007) Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and CYP3A5, MDR1 and IL-10 polymorphisms in adult liver transplant patients. J Clin Pharm Ther 32(5):505–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oteo I, Lukas JC, Leal N, Suarez E, Valdivieso A, Gastaca M, Ortiz de Urbina J, Calvo R (2013) Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in the early post-liver transplantation period and clinical applicability via Bayesian prediction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69:65–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallemacq P, Armstrong VW, Brunet M et al (2009) Opportunities to optimize tacrolimus therapy in solid organ transplantation: report of the European consensus conference. Ther Drug Monit 31(2):139–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1983) Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 11(3):303–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alak AM, Cook M, Bekersky I (1997) Measurement of tacrolimus (FK506) and its metabolites: a review of assay development and application in therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies. Ther Drug Monit 19(1):338–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallemacq P, Goffinet JS, O’Morchoe S et al (2009) Multisite analitical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay. Ther Drug Monit 31(2):198–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindbom L, Pihlgren P, Jonsson EN (2005) PsN-Toolkit—a collection of computer intensive statistical methods for non-linear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 79:241–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bertrand J, Comets E, Mentre F (2008) Comparison of model-based tests and selection strategies to detect genetic polymorphisms influencing pharmacokinetic parameters. J Biopharm Stat 18(6):1084–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hooker AC, Staatz CE, Karlsson MO (2007) Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES): a model diagnostic for the FOCE method. Pharm Res 24(12):2187–2197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz GJ, Work DF (2009) New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4(11):1832–1843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Comets E, Brendel K, Mentré F (2008) Computing normalised prediction distribution errors to evaluate nonlinear mixed-effect models: the NDPE add-on package for R. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 90(2):154–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jusko WJ, Piekoszewski W, Klintmalm GB et al (1995) Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 57(3):281–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao W, Elie V, Roussey G et al (2009) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 86(6):609–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao W, Fakhoury M, Baudouin V et al (2013) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(2):189–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Uesugi M, Masuda S, Katsura T et al (2006) Effect of intestinal CYP3A5 on postoperative tacrolimus trough levels in living-donor liver transplant recipients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 16(2):119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the pediatric coordinator Magda Janssens for patients’ data research support.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flora Tshinanu Musuamba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guy-Viterbo, V., Scohy, A., Verbeeck, R.K. et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in the first year after pediatric liver transplantation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69, 1533–1542 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1501-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1501-0

Keywords

Navigation