Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing Your Own Mood Lability: Use of Mood Stabilizers and Antipsychotics in Pregnancy

  • Complex Medical-Psychiatric Issues (MB Riba, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of psychiatric disorders during the perinatal period can be difficult; psychiatric decompensation during pregnancy can affect not only the mother but also the fetus and neonate. It is imperative that psychiatric providers proactively discuss pregnancy planning, and be able to thoughtfully weigh the risks of untreated psychiatric illness and psychotropic medications in pregnancy and breast-feeding. With the exception of valproate and carbamazepine, several mood stabilizers and antipsychotics can be utilized during pregnancy with minimal risk to the fetus and neonate in terms of major malformations; there is a growing body of evidence regarding the risk profile of use of these medications in pregnancy.

Key Points

  • Preconception planning is very helpful when it can be done; consider discussion and documentation of risks at time of administration of psychotropic medications for any reproductive-aged women, regardless of plans for conception.

  • Continued psychiatric stability through the perinatal period is imperative; the risks of an untreated psychiatric disorder are just as important, if not more so important, than the risks of psychotropic medication exposure.

  • Exposure to one psychotropic medication is safer than exposure to multiple medications.

  • Utilize lowest effective dose of medication; most risks are not dose dependent, therefore would typically prefer higher dose of medication, rather than emergence of psychiatric symptoms, in order to avoid exposure of the fetus to both psychotropic medications and psychiatric symptoms.

  • General recommendations are to avoid valproate and carbamazepine in reproductive-aged women.

  • With close monitoring, lithium can be safely utilized in pregnancy.

  • Preliminary data regarding use of atypical antipsychotics is reassuring in regards to major malformations; however, larger numbers of participants are needed to provide more complete reproductive safety data with this class.

  • Clearly document risks of an untreated psychiatric illness as well as risks of psychotropic medication management to the mother and developing fetus/neonate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84(5):478–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson G. Controversies about the use of antidepressants in pregnancy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015;203:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Viguera AC, Nonacs R, Cohen LS, et al. Risk of recurrence of bipolar disorder in pregnant and nonpregnant women after discontinuing lithium maintenance. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Viguera AC, Whitfield T, Baldessarini RJ, et al. Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1817–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vigod SN, Kurdyak PA, Demia CL, Gruneir A, et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes among women with schizophrenia: a retrospective population-based newborn study. BJOG. 2014;121(5):566–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen LS, Friedman JM, Jefferson JW, et al. A reevaluation of risk of in utero exposure to lithium. JAMA. 1994;271:146–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Lugt NM, van de Maat JS, van Kamp IL, et al. Fetal, neonatal and developmental outcomes of lithium-exposed pregnancies. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(6):375–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NICE. Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance. NICE clinical guideline. Updated 2014. Available at www.nice.org.uk/CG192

  9. Ornoy A. Valproic acid in pregnancy: how much are we endangering the embryo and fetus? Reprod Toxicol. 2009;28(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, Cohen MJ, Bromley RL, Clayton-Smith J, et al. NEAD Study Group. Effects of fetal antiepileptic drug exposure: Outcomes at age 4.5 years. Neurology. 2012;78(16):1207–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen J, Grønborg TK, Sørensen MJ, Schendel D, Parner ET, Pedersen LH, et al. Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism. JAMA. 2013;309(16):1696–703.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosa FW. Spina bifida in infants of women treated with carbamazepine during pregnancy. NEJM. 1991;324:674–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummings C, Stewart M, Stevenson M, Morrow J, Nelson J. Neurodevelopment of children exposed in utero to lamotrigine, sodium valproate and carbamazepine. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96:643–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hernández-Díaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, et al. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78:1692–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holmes LB, Baldwin EJ, Smith CR, Habecker E, Glassman L, Wong SL, et al. Increased frequency of isolated cleft palate in infants exposed to lamotrigine during pregnancy. Neurology. 2008;70(22 Pt 2):2152–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dolk H, Jentink J, Loane M, Morris J, de Jong-van den Berg LT. EUROCAT Antiepileptic Drug Working Group. Does lamotrigine use in pregnancy increase orofacial cleft risk relative to other malformations? Neurology. 2008;71(10):714–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujii H, Goel A, Bernard N, et al. Pregnancy outcomes following gabapentin use: results of a prospective comparative cohort study. Neurology. 2013;80(17):1565–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alsaad AM, Chaudhry SA, Koren G. First trimester exposure to topiramate and the risk of oral clefts in the offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;53:45–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tennis P, Chan KA, Curkendall SM, et al. Topiramate use during pregnancy and major congenital malformations in multiple populations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015;103(4):269–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McKenna K, Koren G, Tetelbaum M, Wilton L, Shakir S, Diav-Citrin O, et al. Pregnancy outcome of women using atypical antipsychotic drugs: a prospective comparative study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):444–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen LS, Viguera AC, McInerney K, et al. The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics: Effects of Fetal Exposure on Risk for Major Malformations. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, June 2014

  22. Kulkarni J, Worsley R, Gilbert H, Gavrilidis E, Van Rheenen TE, Wang W, et al. A prospective cohort study of antipsychotic medications in pregnancy: the first 147 pregnancies and 100 one year old Babies. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e94788.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vigod SN, Gomes T, Wilton AS, et al. Antipsychotic drug use in pregnancy: high dimensional, propensity matched, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2015;350:h2298. Cohort study of antipsychotic use in pregnancy which did not demonstrate an increased risk of maternal obstetrical outcomes.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coughlin CG, Blackwell KA, Bartley C, Hay M, Yonkers KA, Bloch MH. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after antipsychotic medication exposure in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1224–35. Meta-analysis reviewing typical and atypical antipsychotics; no demonstrated difference in the risks of major malformations between these two groups; antipsychotic exposure was not associated with other poor obstetrical outcomes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boden R et al. Risks of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes in women treated or not treated with mood stabilisers for bipolar disorder: Population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e7085.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina L. Wichman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Christina L. Wichman declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Complex Medical-Psychiatric Issues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wichman, C.L. Managing Your Own Mood Lability: Use of Mood Stabilizers and Antipsychotics in Pregnancy. Curr Psychiatry Rep 18, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0646-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0646-1

Keywords

Navigation