Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism
Introduction
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex syndrome with severe disabling fatigue lasting for at least 6 months as the major criterion according to the Centre for Disease Control [1]. The precise medical pathophysiology remains unknown, and many researchers adopt a bio-psycho-social account for this ‘medically unexplained syndrome’, acknowledging the importance of complex and dynamic interactions between biological, psychological and social factors. Within this account, cognitive behavioral models have become increasingly popular [2], [3], [4], [5]. These models propose a set of predisposing factors (e.g., genetics, personality characteristics, and life events), precipitating factors (e.g., physiological factors and general distress) and perpetuating factors (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral, and social reactions) that each may contribute to the development and maintenance of CFS [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].
Cognitive behavioral models are equally well used to deliver treatments for CFS. Most often cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for CFS targets cognitive and behavioral perpetuating factors such as the misbalance between rest and activity, and the belief that they have to be perfect in every situation, potentially resulting in ignoring their physical limits. Research has shown that CBT improves physical functioning and fatigue reduction immediately and some time after treatment [9], [10]. Nevertheless, complete recovery is uncommon.
A recent meta-analytical study of Castell and colleagues shows an overall effect size for CBT of 0.33, which is small according to Cohen's recommendations [10], [11]. This research group suggested that the variability in fatigue outcomes in CBT reflects the existence of moderating variables and examined illness characteristics and treatment characteristics. Regarding illness characteristics, illness duration does not affect the outcome of CBT in CFS. Regarding treatment characteristics, total duration of CBT (in hours) showed a positive influence on the outcome. No evidence was found that the treatment format (group or individual) and treatment duration (weeks) affected the effect size of CBT [10]. Although group programs are often preferred because of the cost efficacy and the involvement of peer support, support groups without therapy do not yield similar outcome results as CBT [12].
Other studies indicate that patient characteristics also matter: CBT effect increases when patients are less focused on their symptoms and are less anxious about it [13], [14]. Until now the role of illness acceptance in CBT has received little attention [15].
Illness acceptance is defined as “recognizing the need to adapt to a chronic illness while perceiving the ability to tolerate the unpredictable, and handle its adverse consequences” [16]. This way of coping with adversity is more and more acknowledged to be related to a good adjustment to chronic illness [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Its function is also well-articulated in self-regulatory models of coping [23], [24], [25]. One example of such a model is the ‘dual-process model of coping’ of Brandtstädter and colleagues [26], [27], which distinguishes between two complementary coping strategies: accommodative coping and assimilative coping. ‘Assimilative coping’ is characterized by active attempts to control the stressor and solve the problem, in order to continue with the pursuit of one's life goals. When a problem remains insoluble and blocks life goals, stress increases and a transition from assimilative to accommodative coping may be required. In accommodative coping “the structure of individual cognitions and valuations is modified to make the given situation appear less negative or more acceptable” that leads to the disengagement from the blocked goals, and goal adjustment or reengagement with feasible goals [26]. Acceptance of adverse consequences and uncontrollability of an insoluble problem is often considered as a key process in accommodative coping [16], [28]. Chronic illness, such as CFS, may be considered as a problem that cannot (yet) be cured or solved, and where an accommodative coping strategy and illness acceptance are to be preferred. In line with this view, cross-sectional studies indicate that acceptance plays a role in adjustment to chronic illnesses, such as CFS and that acceptance has been found to be associated with a better mental health-related quality of life (MQoL) [17], [27], [29], [30], [31]. Of further interest are the results of Brooks and colleagues, who found that CBT for CFS resulted in an increase of acceptance, and that lack of acceptance was associated with fatigue and physical functioning [15]. In our study, we are interested whether acceptance before the start of CBT predicts the effects of treatment regarding health-related quality of life and fatigue.
Another patient characteristic which we will examine in relation to CBT treatment is personality. Personality traits are related to how individuals cope with problems [32]. In particular the trait ‘neuroticism’, which is characterized as the degree of emotional instability, associated with a tendency to experience negative emotions, vulnerability for stress and for psychopathology, may be relevant [33]. First, neuroticism is presumed to be one of the predisposing factors of CFS [4], [5], [34] in biopsychosocial accounts. Second, there is preliminary evidence that neuroticism negatively influences illness acceptance and mental wellbeing in CFS [31]. In our study, therefore, we wanted to examine whether neuroticism before treatment negatively influences the effects of CBT.
Next to fatigue, quality of life (QoL) should be a substantial outcome parameter to evaluate the condition of patients after treatment. QoL often has two dimensions: a mental health quality of life (MQoL) and a physical health quality of life (PQoL). Increasing QoL in patients with CFS is a challenge because recovery is difficult to achieve. Research shows that the QoL is lower in CFS patients compared with other chronic ill and healthy control groups [35], [36], [37]. One of the possible reasons is that overall patients with CFS score higher on neuroticism, which is related to a more negative perception of symptoms, disability, and health [38], [39]. Another reason might be that patients with CFS have difficulties with accepting the fatigue and its devastating consequences, especially because CFS is regarded as a medically unexplained illness [8]. Although it has already been shown that non-accepting cognitions seem to lead to maladaptive activity patterns in patients with CFS which results in increased fatigue, frustration and a negative QoL [30], [31], [40], [41], more research is needed to highlight the importance of acceptance for adjusting to a life with CFS.
In sum, this study examined the extent of improvement related to cognitive behavior group therapy (CBT) on MQoL, PQoL, fatigue and acceptance, using a pre–post design without no-treatment control group, and, of most importance to this study, whether the observed improvement in outcomes is affected by initial levels of acceptance and neuroticism. We will use three methods (statistical, practical, and clinical) to evaluate the pre–post treatment changes in mental and physical health-related QoL, fatigue and acceptance.
Section snippets
Participants
Patients with CFS from the general internal medicine outpatient clinic of the Ghent University Hospital were invited to participate in the study in the period 2009–2011. They experienced group CBT over a period of 6 months. The pre-treatment data were collected during a psychological assessment phase, which was a part of a multidisciplinary diagnostic procedure. In this procedure psychological assessment was the second examination after the diagnostic investigation by the internist. The
Patient characteristics
The mean age in our sample (73 women and 7 men) was 43.15 years (SD = 8.54, range = 24–57 years). We compared the data regarding the study variables of this sample with an independent sample of 117 non-treated CFS patients (collected during the diagnostic screening on CFS) [25]. Mean fatigue severitypre was 6.43 (SD = 0.55) comparable to the mean fatigue in the independent sample (M = 6.37, SD = .76). The mean of acceptancepre (M = 11.73, SD = 3.35) was also comparable (previous sample: M = 11.97, SD = 3.49). The
Discussion
The primary goal of this study was to evaluate whether acceptance and neuroticism measured during pre-treatment were predictive of improvement in mental and physical QoL and fatigue for patients with CFS who followed a CBT treatment. We first focus upon the extent of improvement due to cognitive behavior group therapy (CBT) and, then, focus upon whether improvement was affected by initial levels of acceptance and neuroticism.
Overall, the pattern of results in our study indicates that CBT leads
Role of the funding source
The realization of this manuscript was supported by a ‘Special PhD scholarship’ of the Research Foundation Flanders to Carine Poppe.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to report.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Mrs I. Vandereyden and the fellow psychologists of the outpatient clinic of the General Internal Medicine department of the Ghent University Hospital for their help in data collection for this study.
References (66)
- et al.
The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study
Ann Intern Med
(1994) Text Revision
(2000)- et al.
Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach
Behav Res Ther
(1995) - et al.
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Premorbid predictors of chronic fatigue
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(2006) - et al.
The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: a theoretical and empirical review
Clin Psychol Rev
(2007) - et al.
Dysfunction of stress response systems as a risk for functional somatic syndromes
J Psychosom Res
(2010) The chronic fatigue syndrome—an update
Acta Neurol Scand
(2007)- et al.
Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis
Clin Psychol Sci Pract
(2011)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Does a decrease in avoidance behavior and focusing on fatigue mediate the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome?
J Psychosom Res
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Lancet
Does the heterogeneity of chronic fatigue syndrome moderate the response to cognitive behaviour therapy? An exploratory study
Psychother Psychosom
The role of acceptance in chronic fatigue syndrome
J Psychosom Res
Beyond unfavorable thinking: the Illness Cognition Questionnaire for chronic diseases
J Consult Clin Psychol
Coping with chronic illness in childhood and adolescence
Annu Rev Clin Psychol
The impact of illness acceptance and helplessness to subjective health, and their stability over time: a prospective study in a sample of cardiac patients
Psychol Health Med
Coping and physical health outcomes: an overview
Psychol Health
Acceptance as a coping reaction: adaptive or not?
Swiss J Psychol
Chronic pain acceptance and affective well-being: a coping perspective
Eur J Pain
Behavior change, acceptance, and coping flexibility in highly distressed patients with rheumatic diseases: feasibility of a cognitive-behavioral therapy in multimodal rehabilitation
Patient Educ Couns
Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: a review
Appl Psychol Intern Rev
On the self-regulation of behavior
Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being
Pers Soc Psychol Bull
Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping
Psychol Aging
Goal pursuit and goal adjustment: self-regulation and intentional self-development in changing developmental contexts
Adv Life Course Res
The construct validity of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire: the robustness of the three-factor structure across patients with chronic pain and chronic fatigue
Int J Behav Med
Short-term group therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
Psychother Psychosom
‘That was my old life; it's almost like a past-life now: identity crisis, loss and adjustment amongst people living with CFS
Psychol Health
Mental quality of life in chronic fatigue is associated with an accommodative coping style and neuroticism: a path analysis
Qual Life Res
Personality and coping
Annu Rev Psychol
Interpreting neuroticism scores across the adult life course: immutable or experience-dependent set points of negative affect?
Clin Psychol Rev
Cited by (23)
Using clinical patient characteristics to predict treatment outcome of cognitive behavior therapies for individuals with medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, General Hospital PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :In accordance with our meta-analytic findings, results from one high-quality study indicated that higher symptom intensity at baseline was associated with less improvement of symptom intensity over the course of therapy [56]. In contrast, the second study (indicated as low quality study) did not demonstrate any association between the predictor and outcome variable [57]. Our meta-analysis revealed that pretreatment symptom intensity and symptom intensity at a 6- or 15-months follow-up assessment were not related to each other (p = 0.530).
Psychological Mechanisms in Understanding and Treating Fatigue: Past, Present, Future
2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second EditionNeuroticism and Fatigue 3 Months After Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study
2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :Screening tools such as the NEO-FFI18 and Revised NEO Personality Inventory15,16 could be used for these purposes. Cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with high levels of neuroticism has been shown to improve health outcomes47 and reduce fatigue.48,49 A short-term comprehensive yoga-based lifestyle interventions was effective in improving the resilience of personality in patients with chronic diseases including diabetes and musculoskeletal pain.50
Enhanced psychological flexibility and improved quality of life in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis
2016, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Consistent with NICE Guidelines 2007 [4] and the Framework of Occupational Science [31,32], results indicate that such an approach to the treatment of CFS/ME may facilitate PF and improve QoL. This study extends previous research exploring aspects of PF in a CFS/ME population and provides evidence for the relevance of PF in long term health conditions [10,34,37,39,40]. Findings support our hypothesis that in a CFS/ME population, PF processes, QoL and fatigue severity may significantly improve after an interdisciplinary treatment programme.
Physical symptom attributions: A defining characteristic of somatoform disorders?
2015, General Hospital PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :This group may be more engaged in psychotherapeutic treatments because they experience psychological strain. Furthermore, they may benefit from psychological treatment in accordance with a recent study in which higher pretreatment levels of neuroticism predicted improvement in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome [30]. In connection with the revision of the Somatoform section of the DSM-IV, now called Somatic Symptom Disorder in the DSM, Fifth Edition, one of the associated cognitive features is ‘attribution of normal bodily sensations to physical illness (possibly with catastrophic interpretations)’[31].