Cognitive behavior therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of illness acceptance and neuroticism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.02.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Increasing the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic fatigue is challenging because recovery is seldom achieved. Therefore, it is important to identify processes that improve QoL. This study examined the extent of improvement related to cognitive behavior group therapy (CBT), and whether improvement is affected by initial levels of acceptance and neuroticism.

Methods

Eighty CFS patients followed CBT, and self-reported (pre–post design) on mental and physical QoL (MQoL and PQoL), fatigue, acceptance, and neuroticism. The extent of improvement was analyzed using t-tests, effect sizes, and clinically significant change criteria. Whether acceptance and neuroticism at baseline predicted changes was analyzed by means of correlation and regression analyses.

Results

Significant improvement was found for all variables. The effect size for MQoL and PQoL was small; for acceptance and fatigue, effect size was moderate. About 20% (MQoL) to 40% (fatigue) of the participants clinically improved.

Pre-treatment level of acceptance was negatively correlated with changes in MQoL, not with PQoL changes. Neuroticism pre-treatment was positively related with MQoL changes. Regression analysis showed an effect of acceptance on changes in MQoL beyond the effect of neuroticism.

Conclusions

Although CBT is an evidence-based treatment, the sizes of the effects are often small regarding QoL. Our study also revealed small effect sizes. Our study showed that patient characteristics at baseline were significantly associated with MQoL outcome; indicating that CFS patients with high neuroticism or with a low acceptance show more improvement in MQoL. We propose to specifically target acceptance and neuroticism before treatment in order to maximize clinical relevance.

Introduction

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex syndrome with severe disabling fatigue lasting for at least 6 months as the major criterion according to the Centre for Disease Control [1]. The precise medical pathophysiology remains unknown, and many researchers adopt a bio-psycho-social account for this ‘medically unexplained syndrome’, acknowledging the importance of complex and dynamic interactions between biological, psychological and social factors. Within this account, cognitive behavioral models have become increasingly popular [2], [3], [4], [5]. These models propose a set of predisposing factors (e.g., genetics, personality characteristics, and life events), precipitating factors (e.g., physiological factors and general distress) and perpetuating factors (e.g., physiological, cognitive, behavioral, and social reactions) that each may contribute to the development and maintenance of CFS [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].

Cognitive behavioral models are equally well used to deliver treatments for CFS. Most often cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for CFS targets cognitive and behavioral perpetuating factors such as the misbalance between rest and activity, and the belief that they have to be perfect in every situation, potentially resulting in ignoring their physical limits. Research has shown that CBT improves physical functioning and fatigue reduction immediately and some time after treatment [9], [10]. Nevertheless, complete recovery is uncommon.

A recent meta-analytical study of Castell and colleagues shows an overall effect size for CBT of 0.33, which is small according to Cohen's recommendations [10], [11]. This research group suggested that the variability in fatigue outcomes in CBT reflects the existence of moderating variables and examined illness characteristics and treatment characteristics. Regarding illness characteristics, illness duration does not affect the outcome of CBT in CFS. Regarding treatment characteristics, total duration of CBT (in hours) showed a positive influence on the outcome. No evidence was found that the treatment format (group or individual) and treatment duration (weeks) affected the effect size of CBT [10]. Although group programs are often preferred because of the cost efficacy and the involvement of peer support, support groups without therapy do not yield similar outcome results as CBT [12].

Other studies indicate that patient characteristics also matter: CBT effect increases when patients are less focused on their symptoms and are less anxious about it [13], [14]. Until now the role of illness acceptance in CBT has received little attention [15].

Illness acceptance is defined as “recognizing the need to adapt to a chronic illness while perceiving the ability to tolerate the unpredictable, and handle its adverse consequences” [16]. This way of coping with adversity is more and more acknowledged to be related to a good adjustment to chronic illness [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Its function is also well-articulated in self-regulatory models of coping [23], [24], [25]. One example of such a model is the ‘dual-process model of coping’ of Brandtstädter and colleagues [26], [27], which distinguishes between two complementary coping strategies: accommodative coping and assimilative coping. ‘Assimilative coping’ is characterized by active attempts to control the stressor and solve the problem, in order to continue with the pursuit of one's life goals. When a problem remains insoluble and blocks life goals, stress increases and a transition from assimilative to accommodative coping may be required. In accommodative coping “the structure of individual cognitions and valuations is modified to make the given situation appear less negative or more acceptable” that leads to the disengagement from the blocked goals, and goal adjustment or reengagement with feasible goals [26]. Acceptance of adverse consequences and uncontrollability of an insoluble problem is often considered as a key process in accommodative coping [16], [28]. Chronic illness, such as CFS, may be considered as a problem that cannot (yet) be cured or solved, and where an accommodative coping strategy and illness acceptance are to be preferred. In line with this view, cross-sectional studies indicate that acceptance plays a role in adjustment to chronic illnesses, such as CFS and that acceptance has been found to be associated with a better mental health-related quality of life (MQoL) [17], [27], [29], [30], [31]. Of further interest are the results of Brooks and colleagues, who found that CBT for CFS resulted in an increase of acceptance, and that lack of acceptance was associated with fatigue and physical functioning [15]. In our study, we are interested whether acceptance before the start of CBT predicts the effects of treatment regarding health-related quality of life and fatigue.

Another patient characteristic which we will examine in relation to CBT treatment is personality. Personality traits are related to how individuals cope with problems [32]. In particular the trait ‘neuroticism’, which is characterized as the degree of emotional instability, associated with a tendency to experience negative emotions, vulnerability for stress and for psychopathology, may be relevant [33]. First, neuroticism is presumed to be one of the predisposing factors of CFS [4], [5], [34] in biopsychosocial accounts. Second, there is preliminary evidence that neuroticism negatively influences illness acceptance and mental wellbeing in CFS [31]. In our study, therefore, we wanted to examine whether neuroticism before treatment negatively influences the effects of CBT.

Next to fatigue, quality of life (QoL) should be a substantial outcome parameter to evaluate the condition of patients after treatment. QoL often has two dimensions: a mental health quality of life (MQoL) and a physical health quality of life (PQoL). Increasing QoL in patients with CFS is a challenge because recovery is difficult to achieve. Research shows that the QoL is lower in CFS patients compared with other chronic ill and healthy control groups [35], [36], [37]. One of the possible reasons is that overall patients with CFS score higher on neuroticism, which is related to a more negative perception of symptoms, disability, and health [38], [39]. Another reason might be that patients with CFS have difficulties with accepting the fatigue and its devastating consequences, especially because CFS is regarded as a medically unexplained illness [8]. Although it has already been shown that non-accepting cognitions seem to lead to maladaptive activity patterns in patients with CFS which results in increased fatigue, frustration and a negative QoL [30], [31], [40], [41], more research is needed to highlight the importance of acceptance for adjusting to a life with CFS.

In sum, this study examined the extent of improvement related to cognitive behavior group therapy (CBT) on MQoL, PQoL, fatigue and acceptance, using a pre–post design without no-treatment control group, and, of most importance to this study, whether the observed improvement in outcomes is affected by initial levels of acceptance and neuroticism. We will use three methods (statistical, practical, and clinical) to evaluate the pre–post treatment changes in mental and physical health-related QoL, fatigue and acceptance.

Section snippets

Participants

Patients with CFS from the general internal medicine outpatient clinic of the Ghent University Hospital were invited to participate in the study in the period 2009–2011. They experienced group CBT over a period of 6 months. The pre-treatment data were collected during a psychological assessment phase, which was a part of a multidisciplinary diagnostic procedure. In this procedure psychological assessment was the second examination after the diagnostic investigation by the internist. The

Patient characteristics

The mean age in our sample (73 women and 7 men) was 43.15 years (SD = 8.54, range = 24–57 years). We compared the data regarding the study variables of this sample with an independent sample of 117 non-treated CFS patients (collected during the diagnostic screening on CFS) [25]. Mean fatigue severitypre was 6.43 (SD = 0.55) comparable to the mean fatigue in the independent sample (M = 6.37, SD = .76). The mean of acceptancepre (M = 11.73, SD = 3.35) was also comparable (previous sample: M = 11.97, SD = 3.49). The

Discussion

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate whether acceptance and neuroticism measured during pre-treatment were predictive of improvement in mental and physical QoL and fatigue for patients with CFS who followed a CBT treatment. We first focus upon the extent of improvement due to cognitive behavior group therapy (CBT) and, then, focus upon whether improvement was affected by initial levels of acceptance and neuroticism.

Overall, the pattern of results in our study indicates that CBT leads

Role of the funding source

The realization of this manuscript was supported by a ‘Special PhD scholarship’ of the Research Foundation Flanders to Carine Poppe.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Mrs I. Vandereyden and the fellow psychologists of the outpatient clinic of the General Internal Medicine department of the Ghent University Hospital for their help in data collection for this study.

References (66)

  • K Fukuda et al.

    The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study

    Ann Intern Med

    (1994)
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    Text Revision

    (2000)
  • C Surawy et al.

    Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach

    Behav Res Ther

    (1995)
  • J Prins et al.

    Chronic fatigue syndrome

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • K Kato et al.

    Premorbid predictors of chronic fatigue

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • V Deary et al.

    The cognitive behavioural model of medically unexplained symptoms: a theoretical and empirical review

    Clin Psychol Rev

    (2007)
  • L Tak et al.

    Dysfunction of stress response systems as a risk for functional somatic syndromes

    J Psychosom Res

    (2010)
  • V Wyller

    The chronic fatigue syndrome—an update

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (2007)
  • P White et al.

    Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial

    Lancet

    (2011)
  • B Castell et al.

    Cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis

    Clin Psychol Sci Pract

    (2011)
  • J Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • J Wiborg et al.

    Does a decrease in avoidance behavior and focusing on fatigue mediate the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome?

    J Psychosom Res

    (2011)
  • J. Prins et al.

    Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • M Cella et al.

    Does the heterogeneity of chronic fatigue syndrome moderate the response to cognitive behaviour therapy? An exploratory study

    Psychother Psychosom

    (2011)
  • S Brooks et al.

    The role of acceptance in chronic fatigue syndrome

    J Psychosom Res

    (2011)
  • A Evers et al.

    Beyond unfavorable thinking: the Illness Cognition Questionnaire for chronic diseases

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (2001)
  • B Compas et al.

    Coping with chronic illness in childhood and adolescence

    Annu Rev Clin Psychol

    (2012)
  • E Karademas et al.

    The impact of illness acceptance and helplessness to subjective health, and their stability over time: a prospective study in a sample of cardiac patients

    Psychol Health Med

    (2010)
  • C Aldwin et al.

    Coping and physical health outcomes: an overview

    Psychol Health

    (2004)
  • Y Nakamura et al.

    Acceptance as a coping reaction: adaptive or not?

    Swiss J Psychol

    (2005)
  • D Kranz et al.

    Chronic pain acceptance and affective well-being: a coping perspective

    Eur J Pain

    (2010)
  • J Vriezekolk et al.

    Behavior change, acceptance, and coping flexibility in highly distressed patients with rheumatic diseases: feasibility of a cognitive-behavioral therapy in multimodal rehabilitation

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2012)
  • S Maes et al.

    Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: a review

    Appl Psychol Intern Rev

    (2005)
  • C Carver et al.

    On the self-regulation of behavior

    (1998)
  • C Wrosch et al.

    Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being

    Pers Soc Psychol Bull

    (2003)
  • J Brandtstädter et al.

    Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping

    Psychol Aging

    (1990)
  • J Brandtstädter

    Goal pursuit and goal adjustment: self-regulation and intentional self-development in changing developmental contexts

    Adv Life Course Res

    (2009)
  • E Lauwerier et al.

    The construct validity of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire: the robustness of the three-factor structure across patients with chronic pain and chronic fatigue

    Int J Behav Med

    (2010)
  • S Söderberg et al.

    Short-term group therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

    Psychother Psychosom

    (2001)
  • A Dickson et al.

    ‘That was my old life; it's almost like a past-life now: identity crisis, loss and adjustment amongst people living with CFS

    Psychol Health

    (2008)
  • C Poppe et al.

    Mental quality of life in chronic fatigue is associated with an accommodative coping style and neuroticism: a path analysis

    Qual Life Res

    (2012)
  • C Carver et al.

    Personality and coping

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (2010)
  • J Ormel et al.

    Interpreting neuroticism scores across the adult life course: immutable or experience-dependent set points of negative affect?

    Clin Psychol Rev

    (2012)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Using clinical patient characteristics to predict treatment outcome of cognitive behavior therapies for individuals with medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In accordance with our meta-analytic findings, results from one high-quality study indicated that higher symptom intensity at baseline was associated with less improvement of symptom intensity over the course of therapy [56]. In contrast, the second study (indicated as low quality study) did not demonstrate any association between the predictor and outcome variable [57]. Our meta-analysis revealed that pretreatment symptom intensity and symptom intensity at a 6- or 15-months follow-up assessment were not related to each other (p = 0.530).

    • Neuroticism and Fatigue 3 Months After Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study

      2017, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Screening tools such as the NEO-FFI18 and Revised NEO Personality Inventory15,16 could be used for these purposes. Cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with high levels of neuroticism has been shown to improve health outcomes47 and reduce fatigue.48,49 A short-term comprehensive yoga-based lifestyle interventions was effective in improving the resilience of personality in patients with chronic diseases including diabetes and musculoskeletal pain.50

    • Enhanced psychological flexibility and improved quality of life in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis

      2016, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consistent with NICE Guidelines 2007 [4] and the Framework of Occupational Science [31,32], results indicate that such an approach to the treatment of CFS/ME may facilitate PF and improve QoL. This study extends previous research exploring aspects of PF in a CFS/ME population and provides evidence for the relevance of PF in long term health conditions [10,34,37,39,40]. Findings support our hypothesis that in a CFS/ME population, PF processes, QoL and fatigue severity may significantly improve after an interdisciplinary treatment programme.

    • Physical symptom attributions: A defining characteristic of somatoform disorders?

      2015, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This group may be more engaged in psychotherapeutic treatments because they experience psychological strain. Furthermore, they may benefit from psychological treatment in accordance with a recent study in which higher pretreatment levels of neuroticism predicted improvement in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome [30]. In connection with the revision of the Somatoform section of the DSM-IV, now called Somatic Symptom Disorder in the DSM, Fifth Edition, one of the associated cognitive features is ‘attribution of normal bodily sensations to physical illness (possibly with catastrophic interpretations)’[31].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text