Clinical PaperAuditing resuscitation of preterm infants at birth by recording video and physiological parameters☆
Introduction
National and international guidelines with step-by-step flow charts on how to perform optimal resuscitation are available for caregivers to improve neonatal resuscitation and outcome. Although caregivers are recommended to follow guidelines, the stressful and sometimes unpredictable character of resuscitation can make it difficult to strictly follow guidelines. One study found a significant number of deviations from the Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines.1 Video recording is considered useful for monitoring2 and the detection of problems during resuscitation and it is believed to be helpful to improve resuscitation practice.3 However, video monitoring is subjective and it is difficult to judge the adequacy and effect of ventilation on video. Studies have shown that the judgment of characteristics such as colour, heart rate by auscultation and chest excursions shows large inter- and intrapersonal variability.4, 5
In Leiden, recording physiological parameters simultaneously with video during neonatal resuscitation is considered as standard of care and is performed when time is available to set up the equipment. With the parent's consent, the recordings are used for training, audit and research purposes. This approach makes it possible to evaluate resuscitation more objectively.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the delivery room management of preterm infants by the team in our unit by recording video and physiological parameters and comparing it with the local resuscitation guidelines. We hypothesise that caregivers deviate from the guidelines during neonatal resuscitation and that the subjective, clinical assessment of the condition of the infant is often inaccurate.
Section snippets
Methods
This prospective observational study was performed in the department for neonatal intensive care of the Leiden University Medical Center, a tertiary level perinatal care centre in Leiden, the Netherlands, with an average of 650 admissions per year.
During the study period our local neonatal resuscitation guidelines were based on international guidelines (ILCOR 2006, European Resuscitation Council 2005),6, 7 and national guidelines (Dutch Organisation for Paediatrics 2008 guidelines).8 The
Results
Recordings were made when logistics allowed us to set up our equipment. From January until July 2010, 34 resuscitations of preterm infants at the Leiden University Medical Center were observed and recorded by the researchers. Of those 34 infants, 23 infants (67.6%) were born by caesarean section. The mean (SD) gestational age was 30.6 (3.2) weeks with a mean (SD) birth weight of 1292 (570) grams. Median Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were 5 (3–6) and 7 (6–8).
In 7/34 infants (21%), delivery room
Discussion
In this study, we found that caregivers in our centre often do not follow the neonatal resuscitation guidelines and only 21% of infants were resuscitated strictly according to the guidelines. Deviations from the guidelines mainly occurred within the first 30 s after birth (Step A of the recommended guidelines) and in the way ventilation was given.
Results from this audit emphasised that caregivers needed more time for the initial steps in the resuscitation algorithm and the evaluation of the
Conclusion
Caregivers deviate from resuscitation guidelines for many reasons. Our study suggested that more time may be needed for the initial steps in the resuscitation algorithm and the evaluation of the condition of the infant. At 1 min, caregivers are supposed to make the decision on whether to start ventilation. According to recent data, when following these guidelines approximately two thirds of infants would receive unnecessary ventilation. The recommended timing for interventions in the guidelines
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Mirjam Mulders for her help with gathering data.
References (16)
- et al.
Neonatal resuscitation: toward improved performance
Resuscitation
(2002) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 6. Paediatric life support
Resuscitation
(2005) - et al.
Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance
Pediatrics
(2000) - et al.
Ethical and legal aspects of video recording neonatal resuscitation
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
(2008) - et al.
Variability in the assessment of ‘adequate’ chest excursion during simulated neonatal resuscitation
Neonatology
(2011) - et al.
Clinical assessment of infant colour at delivery
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
(2007) The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: neonatal resuscitation
Pediatrics
(2006)- Dutch Resuscitation Guideline; 2008. To be downloaded at:...
Cited by (88)
Combined application of various quality assessment tools in neonatal resuscitation
2022, Anales de PediatriaState-of-the art training in neonatal resuscitation
2022, Seminars in PerinatologyTechnology in the delivery room supporting the neonatal healthcare provider's task
2022, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal MedicineCitation Excerpt :Providing inflations which coincides with spontaneous breaths would be more effective, but also increases the risks of high tidal volumes and thus the risk of lung and/or cerebral injury [91]. As it is difficult for caregivers to evaluate the presence and quality of spontaneous breathing at birth [8], especially during manual ventilation [7], this hampers safe and effective ventilation at birth. Again, automation can offer a solution.
Characterization of teamwork and guideline compliance in prehospital neonatal resuscitation simulations
2022, Resuscitation PlusCitation Excerpt :Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines9 were established by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Heart Association (AHA), and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) to provide lifesaving care when emergencies occur and improve birth outcomes.10–13 Observational studies of NRP in the hospital setting have identified important gaps in care that need improvement: assessment; initial steps of drying, warming, and stimulating; monitoring and communication of heart rate; and awareness of clinical deterioration.14–17 Chart reviews of hospital records have found that paramedics frequently encounter complications due to maternal comorbidities and extreme preterm births. 18–21
Lung Protection During Mechanical Ventilation in the Premature Infant
2021, Clinics in Perinatology
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.036.