Trends in Cognitive Sciences
ReviewEmotion and decision-making: affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression
Section snippets
Overview
Emotions are an integral part of a person's internal state and, thus, have profound influences on the choices one makes; yet, our understanding of how emotions interact with decision-making (see Glossary) is surprisingly incomplete [1]. Decision-making integrally depends on the computation of the value of available options [2], which, in turn, are a function of the environment and the internal state of the individual [3]. Recent studies have examined how choices are computed in dynamic
Decision-making and emotion
Decision-making is a process that unfolds over time. This temporal structure can be used to identify three component processes. Specifically, choosing among options initially involves the process of assessing the available options. This is followed by the selection of an option based on the value that has been associated with the option. Lastly, the outcome associated with the selected action is evaluated and incorporated into existing knowledge for subsequent decisions. The influences of
Evidence for disruption of decision-making in anxiety and depression
Studies of decision-making in clinical populations are of immense value, because they can help to establish brain-behavior relationships, clarify the nature of dysfunctional process(es) in a disorder group, and point toward the development of potential treatments for disorders. However, when studying decision-making in individuals with a particular disorder, it is important to note that the observed differences between the psychiatric target population and the comparison group are typically the
Bayesian models of decision-making and control
In recent years, the understanding of the behavioral and neural processes underlying decision-making has benefited significantly from neuroeconomic models 2, 76, 77 and reinforcement learning models 13, 78, 79. These approaches have provided insights into how individuals quantify the value of options, what brain systems play a key role in this process, as well as how the underlying neural substrates give rise to behavioral phenomena. However, one critical aspect of goal-directed action
Concluding remarks
The integration of emotion processing and decision-making is challenging on a number of different levels (Box 1). Conceptually, emotions have been defined along arousal and affective valence dimensions, which are difficult to integrate within value and probability frameworks of decision-making. Phenomenologically, emotions are often viewed as highly introspective, whereas decision-making has been quantified along a few external variables. Computationally, emotion processing has been
References (100)
The nexus between decision-making and emotion regulation: a review of convergent neurocognitive substrates
Behav. Brain Res.
(2011)Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy
Acta Psychol. (Amst.)
(2000)- et al.
Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Cogn. Psychol.
(1973) - et al.
Emotion, decision-making, and the amygdala
Neuron
(2008) - et al.
Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation
Neuron
(2002) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.
(1996)Does the brain calculate value?
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2011)Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness
Behav. Res. Ther.
(1986)Generalized anxiety disorder: a preliminary test of a conceptual model
Behav. Res. Ther.
(1998)- et al.
The role of risk avoidance in anxiety
Behav. Ther.
(2006)