Authors

Submit here >>

BMJ Paediatrics Open is a new open-access journal dedicated to publishing original research, clinical reviews and protocols that deal with any aspect of child health. The provision of child health is multidisciplinary and the journal welcomes papers from all health care professions. Papers dealing with paediatric surgery, paediatric specialties, public health and healthcare provision will all be accepted.

BMJ Paediatrics Open adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process. Publication decisions will be made on the scientific validity, ethical soundness and transparency of the research and whether the paper deserves publication, rather than on its apparent interest to any particular readership. The journal will be published continuously online and aims to operate a fast submission and review process, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide.


Editorial policy

BMJ Paediatrics Open adheres to the highest standards concerning its editorial policies on publication ethics, scientific misconduct, consent and peer review criteria. To view all BMJ Journal policies please refer to the BMJ Author Hub policies page.

Articles are published under an exclusive licence (or non-exclusive licence for UK Crown and US Federal Government employees) and authors retain copyright. Articles can also be published under a Creative Commons licence to facilitate reuse of the content; please refer to the BMJ Paediatrics Open Copyright Author Licence Statement.


Manuscript transfer

BMJ and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health have a facility for transferring manuscripts among their paediatric journals. Authors submitting to the flagship journal Archives of Disease in Childhood can choose BMJ Paediatrics Open as an ‘alternate journal’.  

Once authors agree for their manuscript to be transferred to another BMJ journal, all versions of the manuscript, any supplementary files and peer review comments will automatically be transferred on the author’s behalf. Please note that there is no guarantee of acceptance. Contact the editorial team for more information or assistance.


Article publishing charges

BMJ Paediatrics Open is an open access journal and levies an Article Publishing Charge (APC) of 1,350 GBP (exclusive of VAT for UK and EU authors). Charges for publishing a study protocol are 1000 GBP. There are no submission, colour or page charges.

No payment information is requested before an article is accepted, so the ability to pay cannot affect editorial decisions. Accepted articles will not be published until payment has been received. BMJ does not refund APCs once paid.

There is a 25% discount for articles where the corresponding author is a Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health member or where the corresponding author has reviewed for BMJ PO within the previous 12 months. These discounts cannot be combined.

For more information on open access, funder compliance, discounts and waivers please refer to the BMJ Author Hub open access page.

Peer review process

When a paper has been submitted from the Editor, Deputy or Associate Editors’ departments, they have no role in the reviewing or decision making process. This also applies to any Associate Editors who are authors, in which instance the reviewing process is handled by the Editor-in-Chief.

All articles published in BMJ Paediatrics Open will have been sent for external, open peer review. Upon publication, all previous versions of the manuscript are made available, as are the reviewers’ comments and authors’ replies to those comments. Exceptions are made only when an article is accepted based on reviews received at another BMJ journal and the reviewers have not granted permission for their reviews to be posted online.

Post-publication peer review is encouraged via rapid responses.

Data sharing

Authors of original research articles are encouraged to include a data sharing statement when submitting their article. The statement should explain which additional unpublished data from the study – if any – are available, to whom, and how these can be obtained.

At present there is no major repository for clinical data, but Dryad has declared its willingness to accept medical datasets. Authors can start the deposition process while submitting to any BMJ Journal. Dryad provides authors with a DOI for the dataset to aid citation and provide a permanent link to the data. Note that Dryad hosts data using a CC0 licence so authors should check that this is suitable for the data that they are depositing. The DataCite organisation has a growing list of other repositories for research data.

Submission guidelines

Please review the below article type specifications including the required article lengths, illustrations, table limits and reference counts. The word count excludes the title page, abstract, tables, acknowledgements, contributions and references. Manuscripts should be as succinct as possible.

For further support when making your submission please refer to the resources available on the BMJ Author Hub. Here you can also find general formatting guidelines across BMJ and a formatting checklist.

Original Research Article

Word count: up to 2,500 words
Abstract: up to 300 words
Tables/Illustrations: maximum 8 tables and/or figures
References:up to 40 (Systematic reviews that include >25 papers will be allowed more references. We suggest number of included papers + 15)

Word counts may exceed this at the discretion of the editor, but please be aware that exceeding the recommended limit will impact upon the paper’s ‘readability’.

All submissions must contain a box summarising what the article adds to the literature so that readers can gather an overview of the article before reading it. This should be divided into two sections, each with 1-3 sentences and should have the headings:

  • What is known about the subject – followed by a maximum of 3 brief statements (no more than 25 words per statement)
  • What this study hopes to add – followed by a maximum of 3 brief statements (no more than 25 words per statement)

Research submissions should have a clear, justified research question.

All articles should include the following:
  • The article title should include the research question and the study design. Titles should not declare the results of the study.
  • The abstract of an experimental or observational study must clearly state in sequence, and in not more than 250 words, (i) the main purpose of the study, (ii) the essential elements of the design of the study, (iii) the most important results illustrated by numerical data but not p values, and (iv) the implications and relevance of the results.

We require a structured abstract of up to 300 words for reports of randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses, and we encourage it for other studies, where appropriate. The following headings should be used for original research:

  • Objective: clear statement of main study aim and major hypothesis/research question
  • Design: e.g. prospective, randomised, blinded, case control
  • Setting: level of care e.g. primary, secondary; number of participating centres. Generalise; don’t use the name of a specific centre, but give geographical location if important
  • Patients: numbers entering and completing the study; sex and ethnic group if appropriate. Clear definitions of selection, entry and exclusion criteria
  • Interventions: what, how, when and how long (this can be deleted if there were no interventions)
  • Main outcome measures: planned (i.e. in the protocol) and those finally measured (if different, explain why) – for quantitative studies only
  • Results: give numerical data rather than vague statements that drug x produced a better response than drug y. Favour confidence intervals over p values, and give the numerical data on which any p value is based.
  • Conclusions: primary conclusions and their implications, suggest areas for further research if appropriate. Do not go beyond the data in the article
  • Where applicable, trial registration: registry and number (for clinical trials and, if available, for observational studies and systematic reviews)
  • Methods: should be as in the original protocol for the study, which should be submitted as a supplementary file. Where there have been deviations from the protocol, this needs to be justified.
  • Results: should include all the relevant findings. Summarise any data presented in tables. Do not repeat all the information in the tables.
  • Discussion: we recommend, but do not insist, that the discussion section is no longer than five paragraphs and follows this overall structure (you do not need to use these as subheadings): a statement of the principal findings; strengths and weaknesses of the study; strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies, discussing important differences in results; the meaning of the study: possible explanations and implications for clinicians and policymakers; and unanswered questions and future research.
  • A funding statement: preferably worded as follows. Either: ‘This work was supported by [name of funder] grant number [xxx]’ or ‘This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors’. You must ensure that the full, correct details of your funder(s) and any relevant grant numbers are included.
  • A competing interests statement: see this advice from the BMJ on what to include.
  • Articles should list each author’s contribution individually at the end; this section may also include contributors who do not qualify as authors. Please visit the ICMJE website for more information on authorship.
  • Any checklist and flow diagram for the appropriate reporting statement, e.g. STROBE (see below).
  • Patient consent form: any article that contains personal medical information about an identifiable living individual requires the patient’s explicit consent before we can publish it. We will need the patient to sign our consent form, which requires the patient to have read the article. This form is available in multiple languages.
  • Please provide a data sharing statement such as: “Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the Dryad repository, DOI: [include DOI for dataset here].

Authors are encouraged to submit figures and images in colour – there are no colour charges.

BMJ Paediatrics Open does not routinely publish single centre audits but will consider them for publication when the study has genuine implications on wider practice.

Reporting Guidelines

The guidelines listed below should be followed where appropriate. Please use these guidelines to structure your article. Completed applicable checklists, structured abstracts and flow diagrams should be uploaded with your submission; these will be published alongside the final version of your paper.

(for reporting of randomised controlled trials: please use the appropriate extension to the CONSORT statement, including the extension for writing abstracts)

for reporting qualitative research

for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies

for reporting of systematic reviews

for reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis protocols

for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies

for reporting protocols for RCTs

for reporting of gene-disease association studies

for reporting of health economic evaluations

The Equator Network (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of health Research) provides a comprehensive list of reporting guidelines.

Supplementary and raw data can be placed online separately from the text, and we may request that you separate out some material into supplementary data files to make the main manuscript clearer for readers.

Protocols

Word count: up to 2,500 words
Abstract: up to 300 words
Tables/Illustrations: maximum 8 tables and/or figures
References: up to 40

Publishing study protocols enables researchers and funding bodies to stay up to date in their fields by providing exposure to research activity that may not otherwise be widely publicised. This can help prevent unnecessary duplication of work and will hopefully enable collaboration. Publishing protocols increases transparency, which makes it easier for others (editors, reviewers and readers) to see and understand any deviations from the protocol that occur during the conduct of the study.

Protocols should report planned or ongoing studies. If data collection is complete, we will not consider the manuscript. The journal will consider protocols for any study design, including observational studies and systematic reviews.

The SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials) statement (see here for details) is an evidence-based tool developed through systematic review of a wide range of resources and consensus. It closely mirrors the CONSORT statement and also reflects important ethics considerations. We encourage investigators to adhere to the SPIRIT recommendations when drafting their protocols.

The PRISMA-P (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols) is a new reporting guideline. An article stating the guideline checklist has now been published (see here for details). The PRISMA-P checklist contains 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol. Systematic review authors and assessors are strongly encouraged to make use of PRISMA-P when drafting and appraising review protocols.

Various other resources exist that list the ingredients of an authoritative trial protocol, e.g. the UK Dept of Health/Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Toolkit and the US National Institutes for Health provide advice on how to structure a trial protocol. BMJ Paediatrics Open will consider for publication protocols for any study design, including observational studies and systematic reviews.

We strongly encourage you to register your study. Prospective registration is mandatory for any clinical trials. Acceptable registries for trials are listed here. We recommend Prospero for registration of systematic reviews.

The journal will consider publishing without peer review protocols that have formal ethical approval and funding from a recognised, open access advocating research-funding body (such as those listed by the JULIET project). Please provide proof that these criteria are met when uploading your protocol. Any protocols that do not meet both these criteria will be sent for external peer review.

General BMJ policies apply (see above) on manuscript formatting, editorial policies, licence forms and patient consent (where applicable to study designs). Protocols should include, as a minimum, the following items.

Protocols should have the following structure:

  • Title: this should include the specific study type, e.g. randomised controlled trial and make clear that the article reports a protocol
  • Abstract: this should be structured with the following sections: Introduction; Methods and analysis; Ethics and Dissemination. Registration details should be included as a final section, if appropriate
  • Introduction: explain the rationale for the study and what evidence gap it may fill. Appropriate previous literature should be referenced
  • Methods and analysis: provide a full description of the study design, including the following: how the sample will be selected; interventions to be measured; the sample size calculation (drawing on previous literature) with an estimate of how many participants are needed for the primary outcome to be statistically, clinically and/or politically significant; what outcomes will be measured, when and how; a data analysis plan
  • Ethics and dissemination: ethical and safety considerations and any dissemination plan (publications, data deposition and curation) should be covered here
  • Full references
  • Authors’ contributions: state how each author was involved in writing the protocol
  • Funding statement: preferably worded in one of two ways: ‘This work was supported by [name of funder] grant number [xxx]’ or ‘This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors’
  • Competing interests statement

Reviews

Word count: up to 3,000 words
Abstract: up to 300 words
Tables/Illustrations: maximum 8 tables and/or figures
References: up to 40

We welcome submissions of both Practical Reviews (e.g. treatment of the patient with asthma) and systematic reviews which focus on a specific question. For systematic reviews, PRISMA guidelines should be followed and a checklist submitted. In both cases, the Methods section should include a description of the process of literature retrieval.

Practical Reviews should be submitted under the heading of “Review” while Systematic Reviews should be submitted as Original Articles.

Additional information may be placed on the website as a data supplement.

Editorials

Word count: up to 1,200 words
No abstract
No Tables/Illustrations
References: up to 5

Editorials are commissioned by the editorial team and fall into two general categories: comment on particular research papers and comment on wider child health.

Should you wish to publish an editorial in BMJ Paediatrics Open please contact Imti Choonara to discuss your proposal

Supplements

The BMJ Publishing Group journals are willing to consider publishing supplements to regular issues. Supplement proposals may be made at the request of:

  • The journal editor, an editorial board member or a learned society may wish to organise a meeting, sponsorship may be sought and the proceedings published as a supplement.
  • The journal editor, editorial board member or learned society may wish to commission a supplement on a particular theme or topic. Again, sponsorship may be sought.
  • The BMJPG itself may have proposals for supplements where sponsorship may be necessary.
  • A sponsoring organisation, often a pharmaceutical company or a charitable foundation, that wishes to arrange a meeting, the proceedings of which will be published as a supplement.

In all cases, it is vital that the journal’s integrity, independence and academic reputation is not compromised in any way.

For further information on criteria that must be fulfilled, download the supplements guidelines.

When contacting us regarding a potential supplement, please include as much of the information below as possible.

  • Journal in which you would like the supplement published
  • Title of supplement and/or meeting on which it is based
  • Date of meeting on which it is based
  • Proposed table of contents with provisional article titles and proposed authors
  • An indication of whether authors have agreed to participate
  • Sponsor information including any relevant deadlines
  • An indication of the expected length of each paper Guest Editor proposals if appropriate